Morbillinum the Development of Nosodes

I’m afraid I’ve set the bar very high by choosing to discuss Morbillinum [1], as it is a unique remedy belonging to the class of nosodes —that is, a potency a pathological substance. However, it is impossible to prescribe this category of medicines rationally without fully understanding homeopathy, lest one regress to the level of magical thinking, which in this case would consist of giving the same to treat the same.

Introduction

totality symptoms

This kind of simplistic view has even been systematized as “sequential therapy,” which involves administering a series of potentized vaccines to the patient, based on the assumption that these injected substances alone are responsible for all ailments, and that administering the vaccine in a potentized form would magically act like an eraser to “remove” the vaccine from the body, as it were. This ignores the fundamental concept of totality symptoms, which includes the physical constitution, temperament , etiology, miasms, suppressions, all probable causes, events, chronic diseases, medications, immunizations, iatrogenic diseases, traumas, and their signs and symptoms, which are reviewed in the order of their appearance (Organon § 5, 6, 7, 8). To all this are added, to complete the totality, the patient’s objective signs and subjective symptoms, as well as the investigation of obstacles to cure.

Susceptibility

Second, these practices misuse the concept of individual susceptibility, a fundamental concept entirely unknown to conventional medicine, which still believes, for example, that mere contact with a viral particle can make someone sick. When individual susceptibility is innate, we speak of idiosyncrasy: “fatty foods make me sick,” “I can’t stand having my head exposed to the cold,” etc. But the abuse of chemical substances—whether sea salt, tobacco, a vaccine, or any remedy introduced into the body on a daily basis—will eventually induce a susceptibility to that substance [2]. In this case, administering the homeopathically prepared substance—that is, the potentized form—will almost certainly trigger a severe flare-up of symptoms, a reaction from the vital force that will delight the pseudo-homeopath who prescribed it, seeing it as proof of the cure . Some patients will even be delighted to see themselves so affected, thinking that this is a manifestation of remedy curative action. But in reality, all that has occurred is nothing more than a violent experiment with no benefit to the patient.

Vaccine

A third point, which will have escaped no one's notice, is that administering a pathological product to treat the same pathology is akin to the idea of a vaccine. Knowingly or unknowingly, all doctors who practise drug prophylaxis practice homeopathy. It's by giving people an attenuated disease similar to the one we want to preserve them from, a real medicinal disease, that we immunize them against it. In this case, by giving a healthy man a benign condition similar to smallpox, we immunize him against the disease.

It all started with variolisation, a common practice within the Greek community of Constantinople in the^18th century, likely imported from Circassia [3], but already known to the Chinese. By exposing very young children to people with smallpox, it was hoped to mitigate the impact of the disease, which was likely to develop in a mild form. This concept of using a milder form of the same disease as a prophylactic is a form—admittedly a monstrous one—of homeopathy by similars. There was about a 1 in 50 chance of dying from it. It was in 1721 that Lady Montagu, wife of the English ambassador to Constantinople, introduced the practice to the upper echelons of English society.[4] Attempts were thus made to use variolation for measles and even syphilis, [5] using convicts as test subjects. Here we already see the questionable ethics of the allopathic approach.

On May 14, 1796, Edward Jenner —literally “cowpoxed”—James Philips, his gardener’s son, who was then 8 years old, by inoculating him with cowpox.[6] And he variolized him a few weeks later, deliberately exposing him to the wild smallpox virus. Jenner questionable ethics Jenner later Jenner exacerbated when it came to maintaining the cowpox pustule from person to person: never mind, children from orphanages would be used. The risk of death dropped to about 1 in 200, but for the first time, the concept of population and related statistics emerged. Once politics became entangled with industry, all of this turned into a veritable tidal wave of ideology that swept everything in its path.[7] The term “vaccination” is heavy with meaning because, through repeated injections under the pretext of prevention, it is really about the gradual transformation of humans into submissive, unresponsive livestock—and treated as such by the authorities—as the Covid affair has demonstrated.

From the very beginning, we see the seeds of the totalitarian messianism of conventional medicine: the individual matters little as long as “science” progresses—everything must bow to the ideal to be achieved and imposed on everyone. In reality, when I say “science,” we must also see the emergence of the first large-scale health care industry.[8] After two centuries of fraud [9], coercion , and other manipulations that have culminated in the global apotheosis of Covid the crime against humanity constituted by the forced injection of experimental gene therapies, I ask [10]: can anything good come from allopathy?

Arthur Koestler had already answered this question in Le zéro et l'infini : "There are only two conceptions of human morality, and they are at opposite poles. One is Christian and humanitarian, declaring the individual sacred, and asserting that the rules of arithmetic should not apply to human units - which, in our equation, represent either zero or infinity. The other conception starts from the fundamental principle that a collective end justifies all means, and not only allows but demands that the individual be subordinated and sacrificed to the community in any case - which can dispose of him either as a guinea pig to be used in an experiment, or as a lamb to be offered in sacrifice."

Time to talk homeopathy

Now that I've got it right, I need to stitch it up! But how to describe such a vast and complex image in a few words? Homeopathy can only be called such if its cardinal principles are observed:

1) Like cures like,

2) single dose,

3) minimum quantity,

4) the dynamized remedy.

Like attracts like, potency, non-material contagion

If homeopathy—which Hippocratesundoubtedly foresaw Hippocrateshas been applied only marginally since time immemorial, it is because administering to a patient a substance capable of producing a state similar to their own triggers an absolutely terrible reaction of aggravation. As we saw earlier, the patient therefore exhibits a particular affinity, an intense susceptibility to the substance capable of mimicking their condition. Literally, the totality and the remedy potential remedy with extraordinary force. This phenomenon defies common sense because the routine allopathic administration of substances that have nothing to do with the patient’s condition does not provoke this kind of reaction, and large and ever-increasing doses must be administered.

Only Hahnemann had the idea of diluting the substance through successive dilutions, thereby discovering what we would today call the world of energy through this process of potency. An eminent chemist who corresponded with Lavoisier, Hahnemann fully understood that he was discovering a new continent. The Founder writes (note at §249):

“Experience shows that it is almost impossible to dilute a remedy homeopathic remedy sufficiently so that it is not capable of producing a noticeable improvement in the disease for which it is indicated (§160 and §279)”

He writes further (§269):

"The homeopathic system of medicine develops for its own special use an entirely new and hitherto untried procedure, which releases and liberates the immaterial medicinal virtues inherent in raw substances. By this means alone, these substances acquire medicinal virtues and an immeasurably penetrating efficacy, even those which in their raw state show no sign of any medicinal action on the human body".

Homeopathy thus transforms the most potent poisons into medicines. It unifies the concepts of disease and remedy, since the remedy an artificial disease. For example, the potency infectious germs allows them to be transformed into a new medicinal substance that corresponds to the signs and symptoms of the disease they cause.

totality symptoms and vital force

The remedy induces a dynamic—that is, energetic and immaterial—transmission that is perceived by the patient’s vital force because there is a predisposition to perceive this influence.[11] Thus, a toxin administered in large doses poisons everyone; the dynamic signal is perceived only if it encounters the right constitutional makeup in the patient. This is the famous question, “Does alcohol make one drunk?”—one that cannot be answered without considering the two intertwined factors of the quantity of alcohol and the subject’s susceptibility.

These fundamental dynamic concepts—first articulated by Hahnemann around 1796!—are still rarely taught today and even less understood. It is regrettable that few doctors develop their own sense of observation when dealing with patients—they are even taught that their perspective is worthless.[12] Yet the concept of totality symptoms is self-evident: when a person is ill, whether acutely or chronically, a totality symptoms presents itself to the observer. It consists of:

• Common symptoms of acute illness - acute myasma in our jargon
• Common symptoms of chronic active miasm (see below)
• Possibly pathognomonics signs pathognomonics the disease[13]
• Objective and subjective symptoms specific to the patient - not forgetting symptoms reported by family and friends, and
• The patient's characteristic signs[14].

The first question that comes to mind is: what are we to make of a form of medicine that claims the right to treat only a single symptom taken out of this totality? This arbitrary approach is consistent with the Taylorization of an industry, but stands in direct opposition to the science to which the proponents of modern medicine nevertheless claim to adhere.

The second point is more subtle: if such a totality and persists as such, then we must attribute to it a fundamental cause that lies beyond the organs. In other words, the presence of a totality symptoms automatically leads to the notion of a vital force that is energetically disturbed. The signs and symptoms we observe are produced by this energetic disharmony, which is not directly perceptible—disease is the indirect imprint of an energetic disharmony.[15] Corollary: only a dynamic influence can truly heal a pathology.

A third question arises here, but it goes beyond the scope of our article: if the organism "deems" it useful to maintain a given set of symptoms, what is the overall impact of suppressing one or more of them through an artificial chemical process?

Hostile dynamic influx

We’ve finally reached the heart of our presentation on Morbillinum  Physics has accustomed us to the concept of the wave-particle duality. Depending on the experiment, the same object behaves either as a wave or as a particle—this is the case with light, for example.

Traditional medicine, which is purely materialistic, still regards the pathogen alone as the cause of disease. The work of the late Professor Montagnier, confirming Hahnemann’s discoveries, has demonstrated what we call the dynamic aspect of contagion: thus, a pathogen is also associated with a dynamic imprint. We call this imprint a miasm—a Greek term meaning “contamination.”

On the acute level, countless living organisms “vibrate” with their energetic imprint; these are the acute miasms. Montagnier shown that a solution containing germs carries a vibration that can be recorded and re-emitted, making the digital transmission of bacterial DNA possible.[16] It is highly likely, though I cannot prove it, that it is first the dynamic impulse that is felt when one falls ill, and only then does the germ develop within the organism. This is an elegant way of explaining the concept of the incubation period. It also explains how a dynamized dose of Bryonia, for example, is capable of making a patient completely fever-free within a few hours, even while all blood cultures were teeming with pneumococci. An entirely new dynamic—quantum?—biology must be created.

On the chronic level, Hahnemann showed that all chronic diseases result from the transmission to offspring of the energetic imprint of infections that the organism is never able to rid itself of. Tuberculosis, syphilis, certain forms of gonorrhea and the suppression of scabies represent the 4 known chronic miasms. Not content with revolutionizing medicine, Hahnemann created the first form of epidemiology in history.

A patient of tuberculosis descent, for example, will be mentally unstable, with an aversion to routine and a strong need for change. Physically, he or she will be thin but with a healthy appetite, prone to allergies, and now to autoimmune pathologies. All these symptoms are common to this chronic miasm. Acutely, an illness that rapidly progresses to seriousness indicates the activity of a chronic tubercular miasm. In this way, the chronic miasm, grafted onto the vital force like an energetic parasite, is able to influence the course of an acute phenomenon.

As is often the case, the distinction between acute and chronic is purely academic. Thus, an invasion of the body by an acute miasm can leave a permanent imprint. This creates an energetic layer that manifests through its own symptoms and prevents any progress toward a cure if the remedy for the totality symptoms is administered. This is where nosodes shine, with Morbillinum the forefront, as it was not uncommon for severe measles to either cause complications or induce a chronic condition from which the patient never recovered.

The Development of nosodes [17]

One of the direct consequences of the publication of *Chronic Diseases* by Hahnemann (1828) was the development of the use of miasms as potentized remedies for the treatment and prevention of diseases. Shortly after the book’s publication, Hering the first proving of *Psorinum* on himself. The contents of the scabies vesicle were thus the first nosode be experimentally tested.

We owe Hering great Hering for Hering expansion of materia medica . Dudgeon [18] reports that Hering seven new categories of homeopathic remedies.

1. The use of venoms from insects, snakes and other venomous creatures (animal poisons).
2. The use of remedies derived from miasms (nosodes).
3. The introduction of potentized miasms and pathological secretions taken directly from the patient (nosodes).
4. The use of homologous organs, tissues and secretions as remedies (sarcodes).
5. The use of products prepared from potentized miasms in the prevention of infectious diseases (homeopathic prophylaxis using nosodes).
6. The study of the periodic table and the chemical and nutritional elements present in the human body (biochemical relationships).
7. Hering using homeopathic preparations made from the seeds of weeds or harmful plants to destroy them, and using homeopathic preparations made from animals or insects to eliminate and prevent infestations of these harmful species (public health measures).

One important point to remember is the “heroic” nature of nosodes. These are diseases responsible for millions of deaths, and their clinical picture is well known. For this reason, we have a wealth of information at our disposal regarding such conditions, as they are diseases with common causes and similar symptoms that affect large segments of the population. A study of epidemic infectious diseases provides a wealth of information, as they serve as a natural experiment for the nosode.

Dr. Swan had conducted provings Medorrhinum, was asked whether it was legitimate to use nosodes been tested in the homeopathic sense of the term. His response was that miasms had carried out a natural proving of infectious diseases across a very wide variety of constitutions. Consequently, miasms are responsible for pathological conditions that are similar to the diseases they cure, including their rarer complications.

For this reason, a remedy such as Morbillinum the nosode ) has been effective in treating meningitis, lupus erythematosus, conjunctivitis, and spontaneous abortions when the symptoms match. All of these conditions are similar to the complications caused by the measles miasm in the general population.

We prescribe nosode on the “natural” experimentation of the disease they induce, but they would need to be tested on healthy subjects in a potentized form to understand the totality their potential—their complete picture. Unfortunately, this has not yet been done, not by a long shot!

Hering observed that certain characteristic symptoms of nosodes related to their indications. He defined the calling symptoms of nosodes, which are as follows:

• I haven’t felt well since that infection. Sometimes a person never fully recovers from an acute illness, which leads to constitutional symptoms. The effect of this acute miasm remains imprinted on the vital force, forming a layer of “disharmony” within the immune system. This new, stronger layer suppresses the constitutional pattern and hinders cure.
• Lack of response to well-indicated remedies: well-chosen remedies fail to act, suspend their action, or merely modify symptoms.
• Permanent change in symptoms.
• Fragmentary images of constitutional remedies: sometimes, there are very few symptoms on which to prescribe. This situation occurs in defective, pauci-symptomatic cases, where a strong miasmatic layer has suppressed the constitution's ability to show symptoms. Apart from pathological and miasmatic signs, there are few elements on which to base a constitutional prescription. This condition may be due to a combination of traumas, miasms, suppressions and adverse drug reactions.
• Regional miasmatic signs with few characteristic symptoms. The case is so unclear that it boils down to local manifestations alone, with no distinguishing features that would allow for the prescription of a remedy .

Indications for Morbillinum [19]

I hope I will be forgiven for the preceding remarks, as they seemed essential to me for understanding what we are doing when we prescribe a nosode. I can no longer stand to see homeopathy reduced to some form of “alternative medicine” or other nonsense on the level of Madame Soleil’s horoscopes. If homeopathy is to finally bring about the long-awaited revolution in medical treatment, it demands rigor of mind, perseverance in work, and intellectual honesty.

Prophylaxis of epidemic measles

Before mass vaccination—I cannot dwell on this barbarity— Morbillinum an easy-to-prescribe preventive with very good results. Administering it to an entire class prevented the first case from infecting the others. Here, Morbillinum susceptibility to the acute miasm of measles, to which it bears a striking resemblance. Since epidemic susceptibility has been eliminated, the natural disease can no longer affect the vital force. The scope of nosodes prophylactic absolutely immense.

Neurological sequelae or complications of measles

It should be clear to everyone that the remedy efficacy remedy linked to the aftereffects of measles, in cases where the acute illness has had such a profound impact on the body that its mark remains.

It may be the only remedy of producing results in PESS (subacute sclerosing panencephalitis). The first observed symptoms of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis may include poor academic performance, memory loss, temper tantrums, dizziness, insomnia, and hallucinations. Sudden convulsions of the arm, head, or body may occur subsequently. It is a dreadful condition with no remedy in conventional medicine. The homeopathic literature contains documented cases of cure Morbillinum.

syndrome Guillain-Barré is one of the classic complications of MMR vaccines, for example; it is an excellent indication for Morbillinum the patient is hospitalized.

Because the virus tends to affect the brain, Morbillinum is Morbillinum remedy choice whenever a child has a fever after a vaccination. It should therefore be prescribed systematically, and there is a chance of providing a curative effect where ordinary acetaminophen will merely mask the fever.

Despite the industry’s Herculean efforts to deny it, the link between autism and the MMR vaccine is absolutely clear. I recommend reading Robert Kennedy Jr.’s website, Children’s Health Defense, to learn more about the subject. In these terrible tragedies affecting families, the standard narrative goes like this: the child developed a fever after their first MMR shot, and the attending physician prescribed Tylenol. Nothing helped; the fever persisted, so much so that by the time of the booster shot, the child was still running a fever. Once the second injection was administered, the fever subsided, convulsions set in, and the child began to regress. All of this should have been treated immediately with Morbillinum. Those who have not had these distraught mothers before them, or in their arms, those who deny these obvious facts, are dangerous psychopaths and should be doing something other than practicing medicine. In established autism, Morbillinum prescribed as remedy , often with the effect of bringing the picture of a classic remedy into clearer focus.

Mucous membranes of the upper airways

We often find ourselves at a loss when there are no clear symptoms and the patient—whether an adult or a child—presents only with nasal and ocular catarrh accompanied by fever. A hoarse cough, a changed voice, and watery eyes. Diffuse bronchial rales. In short, it resembles the early stages of measles. Here, Morbillinum spectacular results, even though there appeared to be no obvious remedy indicated, since the case presents no specific characteristics.
Morbillinum remarkable in cases of asthenia, weakness of the eyes, blepharitis, or chronic conjunctivitis following measles.

Exanthema

The skin manifestation characteristic of Morbillinum a macular rash that begins on the face or behind the ears. I recall a case of systemic lupus erythematosus where, as a last resort, I administered Morbillinum solely Morbillinum the fact that the condition had begun with a symmetrical saddle-shaped rash on either side of the nose. One might rightly object that this is a nearly pathognomonic sign of the disease, but in this patient there was a history of severe measles that had confined him to bed for weeks. Taking a single 200-potency globule caused a fever of 39°C, which was expected, and the patient was strictly instructed to do nothing. After two days, these general symptoms subsided, and then a sort of scaly peeling appeared all over the body. Biting my tongue—the hardest thing in medicine is to do nothing!—I waited for new symptoms to appear. The patient began to feel increasingly hot, to feel hungry even at night, and to need to uncover his feet at night. The Sulfur I had prescribed as the first remedy, without the slightest effect, worked brilliantly this time. Almost 20 years later, there is still not the slightest clinical or biological sign of lupus…

Tired, cough-prone children

Here we begin to see symptoms that are no longer necessarily linked to a past case of measles. In other words, the substance’s own characteristic picture is beginning to emerge. All these anemic, scrawny children who cough at the slightest exposure to cold and who easily develop bronchitis deserve at least one dose of Morbillinum. This is the kind of case where Tuberculinum might seem indicated, but there is no restlessness, no bad mood upon waking, no sweating of the head, and no excessive appetite. That is where Morbillinum rescue!

Clinical indications

The following indications for Morbillinum from the symptoms observed in measles. Whether or not the patient has a history of measles is not a factor in prescribing the remedy; it is the remedy’s tropism that is the determining factor.

• Recurrent miscarriage: here again, the patient does not present a clear picture, and the main complaint is the tendency to abort.
• Sudden worsening of active tuberculosis, or a tuberculosis infection that had previously been under control, then reappears. This indication derives from the affinity of the measles virus for the mucous membranes of the upper airways. I haven't had the opportunity to test it myself, but Indian literature abounds with cases.
• Chronic inflammation of the eye.
• Chronic otorrhea.
• Swelling of neck lymph nodes.
• Chronic inflammation of the periosteum or joints.

Conclusion

The mainstream medical establishment is ready to vaccinate against anything and everything, as the Covid “plandemic” Covid once again confirmed. On the homeopathic side, there is a strong temptation for those who have never studied it to also prescribe nosode , based on every infectious episode in the patient’s history, for example. In both cases, this approach is flawed.

A pathogen can only thrive in an organism that is already out of balance. We are not sick because we have pneumonia; we have pneumonia because we are sick. Therefore, it is misguided to administer the nosode acute miasm without understanding that one must address the totality the patient’s symptoms—which must be addressed with a remedy . At best, the nosode susceptibility to the germ but will not cure the general disorder that generated the susceptibility. Finally, at the ultimate level of similarity, the cure , to be complete, will require taking into account the active chronic miasm.

Whether it's a pandemic or an epidemic, homeopaths give us unlimited means to deal with any eventuality. A true homeopath is one who goes to his patients' bedsides with a smile!

As predicted by the great Ivan Illich [20], materialistic medicine armed with all-powerful technology has caused medicine to regress, and now it's back to where it started, when Hahnemann wrote (Organon, §1): " It is high time that those who call themselves doctors stopped deceiving poor human beings with their galimatias, and began at last to act, that is, to really help and heal."

Yes, it's high time things changed...

[1] Dr. Gross, one of Hahnemann’s earliest disciples, prepared a remedy called Morbillinum using blood from a young patient with uncomplicated measles, which he diluted homeopathically twice.

[2] This is even the procedure used in homeopathic experiments to make the subject sensitive to the substance being tested.

[3] This Chechen practice was introduced to better sell their pretty girls to Turkish harems.

[4] Often referred to as the English Madame de Sévigné, who wore neither a veil nor disguised herself as a man to visit Saint Sophia, Lady Montagu belongs to that category of extraordinary women who deserve to be better known. Much later, Mélanie Gohier d'Hervilly adopted the same lifestyle, disguising herself as a man to travel to Hahnemann's practice in Köthen, marry him and bring him back to Paris!

[5] At the time—Hahnemann made the same mistake—soft chancre and hard chancre were confused, and it appears that variolisation performed using pathogens from soft chancre, which is not syphilis but *Haemophilus ducreyi*.

[6] Jenner thus Jenner taking a step further the idea of Benjamin Jesty, who, in 1774, deliberately infected his wife and sons with cowpox in order to protect them from smallpox.

[7] Xavier Bazin's must-read "Antivax toi-même" is a fascinating account of the inconsistencies of vaccine medicine. "Introduction à la médecine des vaccins" by Michel de Lorgeril is another gem to have in your library.

[8] I encourage readers to explore *The Joyful Apocalypse*, Fressoz remarkable book Fressoz offers a gripping account of the dubious “deals” between industrialists and those in power, unwittingly laying the groundwork for the great Covid crisis.

[9] The narrative surrounding cowpox is quite appealing—and even Hahnemann was initially in favor of it before realizing that, along with the cowpox virus, all sorts of other substances were being injected into patients. When Jenner the principle to the Academy, nearly all the veterinarians burst out laughing because they had seen time and again patients who had had cowpox still fall ill with smallpox!

[10] "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?" John 1:46.

[11] I'm obliged to paint a picture here, as the subject deserves hours of class time. See our school Planète Homéopathie, the only one to offer a complete study of the Organon.

[12] Instead of applying the Cartesian reasoning of the thinking subject who forms his own opinion, they prefer to be "informed" only indirectly through medical publications (mostly financed by pharmaceutical laboratories), confining themselves to a passive role that does not prevent them from vigorously criticizing anything that falls outside the scope of their knowledge.

[13] In other words, they are absolutely characteristic of the pathology. Pericardial rubbing on auscultation denotes pericarditis, erythema migrans Lyme disease, and so on.

[14] These signs alone are sufficient to determine the choice of remedy . They have nothing to do with the disease itself, or are the opposite of what one would expect in the disease. For example, cholera is not a febrile illness, yet the patients I treated in Haiti all complained of feeling too hot. Most of the time, the heat was described as being near the left shoulder blade, which is characteristic of Phosphorus. In certain cases of sore throat, the patient experiences less pain when swallowing, which is the opposite of the norm, etc.

[15] See "Principles of the New Medicine", §11. In this first volume, I retranslate and comment on aphorisms 1 to 70 from the ^6th edition of Hahnemann's Organon.

[16] See, for example, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTHRZvyK9e4. A translation of the 2010 article can be found atmontagnier.

[17] This chapter owes a great deal to David Little, who served as my mentor on the subject of nosodes. He is arguably one of the world’s leading homeopaths today.

[18] In Conférences de Théorie et de Pratique homéopathique, pp. 141-175.

[19] I owe most of the information on Morbillinum to the excellent book by my friend Dr. Gaurang Gaikwad, *Materia Medica of Nosodes Sarcodes*.

[20] See his book "La Némésis médicale".