Preamble 2025

This article, most of which was written as early as February 2020 and expanded upon over the summer, hasn’t really aged a bit. Everything I described has not only been confirmed, but we are receiving increasingly worrying reports from all quarters about the state of public health following the forced injections… you know, the very ones that earned the doctors tried at Nuremberg the noose.

How can you make your voice heard when the organisers control the media and the packs of attack dogs across all social media platforms?

At least we will have done what our duty demands of us, and we shall not have to face the reproach of cowardice or inaction.

To all you bastards!

To all those who have fallen in the cause of Truth, choosing to follow their conscience rather than their own interests. Magna est veritas et praevalebit!

To you, the consulate doorman, who makes a woman who is nine months pregnant wait standing outside in the sun for an hour on the pretext that she refuses to make her five-year-old child wear a mask to enter. You don’t see the connection with Nazism and you take offence at the very suggestion.

Here’s to you, my baker, who, with your Bac -20, is lecturing me on how to wear a mask.

To you, anonymous shrew, who grabs your phone to report that nasty customer who’s walking on the same floor as you in a shop but refuses to wear a mask. You don’t hesitate to call the police; tomorrow it’ll be to «take» these anti-social elements to «re-education» camps. Their final destination will matter little to you; you’ll have the satisfaction of a job well done, just like all those before you who have done the same.

To all the mediocre souls who, throughout history, have paved the way for despotism through their blind servility, and who, without realising it, bring to life the words of the Messiah («I have not come to bring peace, but a sword», Matt 10:34).

Un plan pour le monde

By Dr Édouard Broussalian, 18 November 2021

«Beneath the wheel that endlessly turns, two kinds of people live without torment: those who know the secrets of the world, and those who are utterly ignorant of them.» Omar Khayyam.

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose editors attended our meetings and honoured their promises of discretion for nearly 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world had we been subjected to the glare of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and ready to move towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and global bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination practised in past centuries.” David Rockefeller.^[1]

«When consent and the individual’s best interests are no longer inalienable priorities, we are moving closer to the eugenic theories that flourished from the late 19th century onwards and were taken to an industrial scale by Nazism,» Dr Nicole Delépine.

Nothing predisposed me to play the role of Cassandra, yet over a year ago I was already predicting the situation in which we now find ourselves. Perhaps some intangible link connects my roots on the Bosphorus with the daughter of Priam, King of Troy? A defender of homeopathy for 40 years in the face of the rotten rhetoric of the system and its minions, an epigenetic bearer of the effects of the first genocide^[2] of the 20th century and 800 years of dhimmitude^[3], we are better equipped intellectually to grapple with the terrifying notion of a seemingly elected government par the people, but who now work against the People.^[4] When I made a public statement in September 2020^[5] that this fabricated pandemic was nothing more than a global heist designed to establish a dictatorship, and that only a popular uprising will be our salvation, I was no more believed than Cassandra when she warned that the Trojan Horse was a ruse that would lead to the city’s ruin. Few people understood from the outset:

1. That this «pandemic» was greatly exaggerated^[6] since we soon found ourselves at the point where we had to get tested to see if we were ill — as for him, the report^[7] Data from the Technical Agency for Hospitalisation Information reveals that Covid accounted for only 2% of hospital admissions in 2020:
   1. It is only because the very concept of a pandemic has been tinkered with since 2009 that we have ended up where we are today. ^[8]
   2. As clinicians working on the front line, we have all identified a form of coryza that can progress relatively quickly to a cough accompanied by severe shortness of breath, followed by respiratory distress.
   3. Confident in the track record of uninterrupted, resounding successes achieved over two centuries, we knew that homeopathy would, as ever, prove extremely effective in treating any epidemic.^[9] It is surely no coincidence that an all-out war was declared on homeopathy shortly before this whole affair unfolded, in the form of a globally orchestrated attack just before the first cases of COVID-19 emerged. Following the delusional attack by 124 complete strangers^[10] reported across all media outlets, without us ever being granted the slightest right of reply; it was the famous Australian NHMRC study that made the rounds around the world, serving as a pretext for governments in France and elsewhere to justify measures against homeopathy, whilst a Senate inquiry^[11] An Australian woman revealed the forgery^[12] of the study. No retraction has ever been published in the press, but the coordinated nature of the attack clearly demonstrated the hierarchical structure of the compliant media. The approach is in every respect similar to what happened with the bogus study^[13] published in *The Lancet*, which completely discredited hydroxychloroquine.^[14] The study served as a pretext for our government to withdraw a product that had become dangerous, even though it had been prescribed to more than 1 billion people over a period of 70 years. And, as is customary, the retraction of the study never led to the withdrawal of the measures taken on the basis of it. Even more deplorable: the Pasteur Institute has retracted the bogus study that was used to justify the health pass… yet the pass remains in place.^[15]
   4. Totalitarianism hijacks science to confirm whatever suits its purposes, the idea is to create a «sur-reality» to which the ‘believers’ will subscribe — this was the case with the founding of Islam by the Caliphs^[16] and the narrative centred on an imaginary prophet, or Bolshevism with its promotion of demigods and the narrative surrounding its grandiose project. Ultimately, all this corresponds exactly to what Augustus did when he seized power by securing control over the religious establishment and the augurs — hence his name. On the subject of predictions, has anyone heard anything about the 500,000 deaths in 2020 and the 400,000 in the first quarter of 2021 that the infamous Macron had foretold? Yet everything we are enduring is in the name of these imaginary deaths, this fake pandemic and this pseudo-Covid-19.
2. That without PCR tests, there was no pandemic^[17] and that the test was deliberately flawed in order to detect as many «cases» as possible. But that was all that was needed to fit the new definition of «pandemic», simply «cases», not necessarily people who are actually ill, let alone deaths. A document^[18] which has just been published by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the well-known PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not from actual samples of the Chinese virus, but rather from what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus. The FDA document clearly states that standard genetic material from seasonal influenza was used as a test control in the PCR test kits.^[19]
   1. Incredibly enough, Corman-Drosten’s article^[20] was submitted to Eurosurveillance on 21 January 2020 and accepted for publication on 22 January 2020. On 23 January 2020, the article was published online.
   2. Even more incredible is the fact that, although Drosten had already sent his test protocol to the WHO in Geneva on 17 January 2020, it was officially recommended by the WHO as a global test to detect the presence of the Wuhan coronavirus, even before the article was published.
   3. What can be said about the amplification cycle scandal? The WHO and Drosten recommended a Ct of 45 cycles. It is hardly surprising that, as the number of tests increases at the start of the winter flu season, the number of ‘positive’ PCR results in Germany and elsewhere is skyrocketing. As critical authors point out, if health authorities were to specify a maximum of 35 cycles – in line with Jaafar’s article at the IHU, which uses 35 cycles – only 3 per cent of results would be true positives! They note, ‘a test result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically completely meaningless (a reasonable Ct value should not exceed 30).’
   4. On 27 November 2020, a group^[21] A highly respected group of more than 20 virologists, microbiologists and scientists from around the world has published an appeal in *Eurosurveillance* calling for the withdrawal of the 23 January 2020 article by ‘Dr’ Christian Drosten, the inventor of the so-called PCR ‘test’. Their meticulous analysis of the original paper is damning. Theirs is a genuine ‘peer review’. They accuse Drosten of ‘fatal’ scientific incompetence and of flaws in the promotion of his test.
   5. It is even possible that this test, which is inserted deep into the nose, could soon be used to create a database of the entire population using DNA from the swabs. A British company intends to make a great deal of money from this.^[22]
3. That it is solely the servile complicity of the (so-called) media — with the notable exception, in France, of *France Soir*^[23] and a few others—backed by fierce censorship across all social media platforms^[24] made it possible to establish the official line^[25] in the minds of a hypnotised population^[26], dumbfounded. Any form of critical thinking, whatever it may be, is immediately suspected of being a conspiracy theory,^[27] Most competent professionals are silenced by the fear of being disparaged!^[28] The major test posed by the H1N1 flu taught globalists that absolute control of the media was essential to the project’s success. This has now been achieved. Faced with media outlets complicit in the conspiracy, spouting ad nauseam the system’s prevailing orthodoxy, systematic censorship — particularly on social media — and the ridicule of any dissenting voice through labels such as «conspiracy theorist» or «anti-vaxxer». Organised censorship across all social media platforms and in the appointed^[29],^[30] proved to us very early on that there was a plan, a deliberate intent and a coordinated criminal effort, involving the so-called «fact-checkers» — mere IT specialists or video-game players who had proclaimed themselves defenders of «science»^[31]— forming repressive battalions in order to uphold the WHO’s vision and orders at all costs. Let’s take a look at this narrative:
   1. A terrifying epidemic (for example, horrific images, in the style of Timisoara^[32] hospitals with beds in the corridors – which is, in fact, what happens every year during the perfectly normal flu season)
      1. The COVID-19 pandemic is not a public health crisis but a mass crime.
      2. For those under 60, 2020 was the year with the lowest death toll in the history of France.^[33]
   2. No effective (early) treatment available, doctors prohibited from prescribing, prescription of life-threatening drugs (Valium, Rivotril):
      1. « Proving that there is no treatment for the virus has been a constant struggle, at the risk of laying bare the gross incompetence of various parties. » writes Dr Michel de Lorgeril, who adds, «and any scientist who dares to say otherwise will be vilified and labelled a conspiracy theorist.»
      2. General practitioners, who naturally bear the brunt of any epidemic, have had cases taken off their books and have been banned from prescribing hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, which work remarkably well^[34], with the result that many cases were able to progress to severe forms and overwhelm hospitals. All over the world, criminal governments such as that of France have banned the prescription of a drug that would have saved many lives – a ban based on a thoroughly bogus article published in a «prestigious» journal, which clearly illustrates just how far conventional medicine has fallen. Numerous treatment protocols involving ivermectin^[35] have also amply demonstrated their effectiveness.
      3. The monitoring network was similarly shut down because its actual figures contradicted the government’s propaganda.^[36]
      4. By all accounts, the French health and political authorities have done everything in their power to ensure that COVID-19 patients die in large numbers by pursuing five simultaneous strategies:

• Denying access to hospitals to the majority of patients, that is to say, the elderly; ;
• Denying hospitalised elderly people access to intensive care services; ;
• Advising on unnecessary treatments; ;
• Banning effective treatments; ;
• Killing rather than treating.

Premeditated criminal intent is evidenced by official documents authorising the administration of lethal poisons to patients whilst prohibiting the prescription of the most promising treatments. In France, people aged over 70 were turned away from intensive care units even though more than half the beds were empty.^[37] «The lockdown in November and December did not alter the use of medicines recommended for COVID-19. Whilst lockdowns do not generally affect hospital prescriptions, this leads one to believe that there was a shortfall in prescriptions specifically for patients with COVID-19 during the «first wave». Given the very high number of recorded cases, such a decline is incongruous. How can we explain that, in the midst of an epidemic, we could reach an all-time low in the prescribing of medicines indicated for treating that very epidemic?»
A government decree dated 28 March 2020^[38] has exceptionally authorised the use of Rivotril in cases of COVID-19, given that just one or two injections are enough to kill a patient. It is therefore not surprising to note that, unlike medicines that treat the condition, a widespread over-prescription of lethal drugs. Prescriptions for injectable Valium rose from 53 % to 63 % in April–May compared with the 2017–2019 average. As for injectable Rivotril, its consumption skyrocketed, increasing 3.9-fold in April during the peak of the epidemic, and has since remained 2.3 times higher than the 2017–2019 average.

• 1. The essential restrictive measures until herd immunity through vaccination is achieved (the the concept of natural immunity having now been discarded by the WHO) ^[39],^[40]
     1. The measures implemented as a form of «prevention» for the elderly undoubtedly caused them to die of grief, isolated in their rooms.
     2. During the congressional hearings, Representative James Jordan (R-OH) asked Dr Fauci to explain why the prevalence of the disease in Michigan, which remains locked down, is worse than in neighbouring Wisconsin, which has long been fully open. Fauci claimed that he had not heard the question, had not seen the chart and had not understood it. In the end, he remained seated in silence after uttering a few platitudes about differences in enforcement. The «lockdown advocates» are now faced with the huge problem of Texas. This state is fully open, with no restrictions whatsoever. Cases and deaths have fallen dramatically over the same period. Fauci has no answer. Or, compare locked-down California with open Florida: similar mortality rates. We have a full range of examples across the United States that allow us to compare lockdowns and reopening measures with disease outcomes. There is no correlation.
  2. Only vaccination would save us and break the deadlock^[41] and would put an end to the mistreatment of the peoples.

«And if you think this spiral will stop at a beach pass, take a look back: what is the unthinkable red line that governments have not ultimately crossed over the last thirteen months? What inalienable right of the individual has not been violated? From the moment the state assumes the right to access your body, for whatever reason, it becomes its owner. It has power over it.» Slobodan Despot.

• • 1. For a homeopath accustomed to criticising conventional medicine, it is clear from the outset that every effort would be made to distort the much-discussed concept of benefits [for the pharmaceutical companies] versus risks [for the victims]—especially as the «studies» included virtually no elderly people, even though it is precisely them whom the measures were intended to protect as a priority.
    2. The usual approach is to emphasise the severity of the illness (for example, instructions given to the funeral directors^[42] to classify as Covid deaths anyone who has had a cough and a fever, or any vague symptoms, whilst concealing the side effects.^[43],^[44],^[45] Yet here we have an outpouring of side effects that can no longer be concealed. In each of these countries, which began mass vaccination in December or early January, a previously unseen spike in mortality was observed.^[46] Omerta: with media silence no longer enough, databases are now being redacted on a large scale.^[47] MP Mathilde Panot has delivered a remarkable speech condemning the situation,^[48] This stands out starkly against the prevailing climate of collaboration. For those who haven’t yet realised, the only immunity is that enjoyed by the laboratories that have managed to impose contracts containing onerous terms^[49] In all cases, the contracts relating to Europe were signed by a single person, Stella Kyriakides, who received several million in bribes.^[50]
    3. The injection — which cannot be called a vaccine, even though Merriam-Webster had the nerve to change the definition of the term to become COVID-19-compliant I suppose—it is proving, month after month, to be a highly toxic substance. Genetic manipulation causes our cells (mostly those of the vascular endothelium) to produce the S1 spike protein. However, the spike protein itself is responsible for the disease, which is essentially endovascular; its presence on the surface of cells leads to coagulation processes.^[51],^[52],^[53],^[54] Under the microscope, coagulation occurs within a short time when the blood comes into contact with the substance; it is reasonable to assume that graphene strips iron molecules from the red blood cells, which triggers the coagulation process and may explain the magnetic effects observed. ^[55]
       Furthermore, these products probably contain substances that are not supposed to be present, such as graphene oxide.^[56] Many people have found that the area where the injection was given, and subsequently other parts of the body, become magnetic.^[57] Some sources even mention the presence of parasites or parasite eggs.^[58] Deliberate — and forced — poisoning is undoubtedly one of the aims of the current crisis and will make it difficult for our leaders to plead not guilty when they stand trial before a court-martial. The classic ethical principle governing ‘clinical trials’ is to halt experimental therapeutic research as soon as the trial affects the life and health of others. Some studies have halted an FDA-authorised therapeutic trial after just one death, as was the case with a French pharmaceutical company^[59], whilst other experts believe that a maximum of 20 to 50 deaths are more than enough to establish that the product in question is ‘dangerous’ and to halt the trial.With over 13,000 reports to the CDC concerning deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines, these vaccines now have the highest mortality rate of any vaccine in history. Indeed, the average number of vaccine-related deaths reported to the CDC each year, prior to COVID-19, was just over 100 per year. In other words, COVID-19 vaccines have around 100 times more reported deaths per year than the average number of reports for all other vaccines combined. In the past, individual vaccines have been withdrawn from the market following as few as 12 to 50 reported deaths. Deaths linked to the COVID-19 vaccine are catastrophic and, worse still, the reported deaths reflect only a small fraction of the actual vaccine-related deaths in the community.^[60]
    4. Yet one need only look at the recent history of communicable diseases – involving new infectious agents (HIV/AIDS, Ebola, Zika, Chikungunya, dengue, Lyme disease, etc.) – to cast several shades of doubt on the rosy narrative that would have us believe that vaccine technology will provide miraculous solutions to the COVID-19 crisis.
    5. History reminds us that:
    6. 1- All epidemics eventually die out of their own accord
    7. 2- No vaccine has ever succeeded in bringing an epidemic to an end.
    8. 3- Vaccination during an epidemic always leads to an increase in mortality by the Buchwald effect.^[61]
    9. And when we’re given the example of the eradication of the variole It is merely a reference to a myth. The final report^[62] acknowledges that «mass vaccination has failed» and that it is surveillance and containment that have proved successful » Here again, «eradication campaigns relying entirely or primarily on mass vaccination were successful in a few countries but failed in most cases. » We also read: «In Java, despite vaccination rates exceeding 90%, transmission continued in densely populated areas… until effective case detection and surveillance systems were fully established.»
    10. We are subjected to the totalitarianism of mental constructs: it has been decided in the corridors of power that obstacles to vaccination must be removed, as the vaccine is «our way out of the crisis». In the second chapter, we shall explore how industrial medicine embodies despotism, by treating nothing more than amorphous, de-individualised masses. This began with the preparation of the vaccine using orphans to maintain the strain; Pasteur continued in the same vein, by massively falsifying his results — the heirs of Dr Roux, Pasteur’s illustrious collaborator, published the correspondence between Brouardel and Pasteur, thereby revealing how the death of a child inoculated with dried spinal cord extract from a rabid animal was covered up by passing it off as a uremic crisis, thus saving the reputation of French science.^[63] As far as ethics are concerned, in 1884 Louis Pasteur himself wrote to the Emperor of Brazil asking for permission to infect prisoners on death row with cholera in order to test treatments on them.^[64]
    11. Now, in the name of a delusional theory such as the inherited immunity herd immunity — or rather, group immunity — the massacre will now also target children^[65], especially as we are on the way to doing away with parental consent.^[66] and pregnant women — a meta-analysis reviewed 192 studies and found a case fatality rate of 0.02% among pregnant women with Covid-19, based on all-cause mortality.^[67]
    12. And we’re supposed to take the word of dodgy laboratories at face value^[68] that an experimental gene therapy would — with no known historical precedent — produce a result that vaccination has never achieved since the practice began?
    13. Personally, I really burst out laughing when we were told the vaccine was 95%% effective, based on studies that weren’t even double-blind. As 2021 draws to a close, the evidence continues to mount regarding the fraud behind these «studies».^[69],^[70],^[71],^[72] Right from the start, it was also easy to see that the constant mutation of the coronavirus would serve as a convenient excuse for the vaccine manufacturers to justify their abject failures. As for the farce that is the marketing authorisation process, the ANSM, France’s medicines regulator, is completely indifferent to the fact that, as of today (29/10/21), the administration of the four Covid vaccines can be carried out in a completely illegal manner on its territory: Indeed, it has been unable to provide evidence that the Conditional Marketing Authorisations (AMMc) governing the distribution of these products even exist yet…^[73]
    14. A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts has published a report calling for the safety and efficacy of ‘ vaccines »Current COVID-19 developments, and is now calling for an immediate end to all vaccination programmes. Among them is the geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude — who deserves to be named Woman of the Year.".^[74]
    15. In the next chapter, «And You, Unfortunate Peoples», we shall examine in detail the devastating effects of compulsory vaccination.
  1. All of this is served up to the people via a propaganda machine, relayed by countless collaborators and other useful idiots^[75],^[76],^[77] which reduces Goebbels and the masterminds behind mass manipulation to the level of a nursery school, bringing into play mechanisms such as the reduction of cognitive dissonance or the Stockholm syndrome :
     1. Let’s remember how Orson Wells^[78] —the forerunner of today’s manipulators— had managed to make people believe that Martians had landed simply by using a radio station. Imagine the combined firepower of all the media…

«A plain and simple assertion, devoid of any reasoning or evidence, is one of the surest ways of instilling an idea into the minds of the masses. The more concise the assertion, the more devoid it is of any semblance of evidence or proof, the greater its authority.» Gustave Le Bon.

• • 1. The first of the most common mistakes^[79] A common misconception about how official propaganda works is to think that its aim is to deceive the public into believing falsehoods (that masks protect us, that the vaccine protects us, that public health measures protect us, and so on)… However, although propagandists are certainly pleased when someone believes their lies, deception is not their primary aim.
    2. The primary aim of official propaganda is to create a «narrative» that can be mechanically repeated by the upper classes and those who support them and identify with them. This official narrative need not be coherent or credible, nor does it need to stand up to critical scrutiny. Its plausibility is not what matters. What matters is to draw a Maginot Line – a defensive ideological boundary – between «Good», as defined by the upper classes, and the truths that contradict the official narrative.
    3. In openly despotic societies, the stakes involved in this sort of choice (to conform or to disobey) are often a matter of life and death. In our Western societies (for those of us who are not militant guerrillas), the consequences of non-conformity are generally more subtle, but the pressures remain intense. Conforming to the consensual «reality» produced by these narratives is the price of admission to the inner sanctum where jobs, money, professional prestige and the other rewards of capitalism are to be found. Conforming to the narratives does not imply believing in them. It simply requires unconditional allegiance and obedience. What one actually believes is of no importance, as long as one parrots the official narrative of the moment.
    4. To sum up, official propaganda is not intended to deceive the public (any more than the lines in an actor’s role are intended to deceive the actor). It is intended to be absorbed and repeated, however implausible it may be. In fact, it is often more effective when those forced to repeat it like robots know that it is utterly ridiculous, because the humiliation of having to do so cements their allegiance to the ruling class.^[80]

1. That the repressive, inconsistent, illogical and arbitrary measures imposed (wearing masks, social distancing, house arrest, closure of all shops) were not only disproportionate to the supposed crisis but also contrary to common sense, lacking any scientific justification whatsoever, or having already been shown to be ineffective.^{[81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87]}
   1. How many lives have been saved thanks to the closure of the underwear, socks and T-shirt sections? How many cases of transmission have been prevented thanks to the frenzied washing of hands with chemicals – billions of tonnes of which have been dumped into the environment and which are full of endocrine disruptors?^[88] More than 150 billion face masks are produced every month, with none of them being recycled.^[89] There is a fear that a new continent of plastic is floating on the surface of what remains of our oceans.
   2. As for face masks, nobody bothered to mention the major Chinese study^[90] published in *Nature*, based on the staggering figure of 10 million patients (dictatorships do have their good points sometimes), which clearly demonstrated that asymptomatic individuals are not infectious.
   3. The Wearing a mask is a sign of popular submission the government’s idiotic measures — one can well imagine the perverse delight of Macron and his ilk at the thought of having succeeded in making everyone breathe in their own spittle… Just as with the Islamic veil in countries subjected to the oppression of the Sharia, the state’s despotism uses violence to bring you back into line with the established order.^[91]
   4. Lockdown—justified by dubious modelling, notably that of the highly influential Professor Ferguson. No doubt in need of funds despite generous funding from the Gates Foundation, the latter used a programme worthy of Sim City, enabling him to predict 500,000 deaths in Britain, then ultimately 20,000.^[92] The greatest panic in history and the unprecedented paralysis of the economy are based on wild speculation. The code related to a flu model developed in 2005 for Taiwan.^[93] Rather than making the code available to other stakeholders in the field so that they could examine it at that stage and help influence the measures taken by governments, Ferguson chose to approach Microsoft. Why? To rewrite the code and improve it. As a result, no one was able to see the shoddy original code used to create a flawed model that governments used to lock everyone down. Since when has Microsoft become the expert in epidemic modelling? Of all the steps he could have taken, he turned to Microsoft, rather than other experts in the field, to model the pandemic correctly. This is troubling. Why? Could it be due to some loyalty to, or influence from, Microsoft? Perhaps to Microsoft’s founder, Bill Gates? The Gates Foundation has funded Imperial College at various points in time. Note the range of dates over which the funding increased by … 29 times! (29x).
      In 2010, $2 million was paid to Imperial College :
      
      In March 2020, $79 million was paid to Imperial College: !

Wherever you look, you can see Gates’s influence through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.^[94]

1. That everything would be done to push for compulsory vaccination — and even forced vaccination — of the world’s population, assuming that experimental gene-based injections administered in breach of international law can be called «vaccines».^[95]
2. That not only travel but also all our everyday activities would be subject to a vaccination requirement that is set to become permanent,
3. That the curtailment of freedoms heralded the establishment of a Chinese-style dictatorship^[96], based on constant technological surveillance – initially through health passports, and eventually using RFID chips, facial recognition and other 5G technologies – with individuals becoming «connected» in the same way as their car or fridge.^[97]

The globalist wolf has come out of the woods.

This war against the Peoples leaves us with no alternative but to win or die. No, there will be no rest and no turning back until the instigators and accomplices of this global «coup» – with its delusional and farcical narrative of a pandemic that does not exist, imposed in unison – have been brought to justice.^[98] by those in power and endlessly repeated by the media. John Ioannidis, arguably the greatest epidemiologist of our time, states in a study published by the WHO^[99], but has been completely sidelined since October 2020, when

«The estimated infection fatality rates tended to be much lower than estimates made earlier in the pandemic.»

Our scholar is fond of euphemisms: there is, in fact, a factor of 14 between the initial figures — which were used as a benchmark for declaring the pandemic and imposing all those absurd measures — provided by the Chinese health authorities, and the figure established by Dr Ioannidis. Thanks to Covid, widespread corruption has been brought to light, and many of our colleagues who were living in the cosy comfort of the consensus are discovering, by exercising their critical faculties, the horror of the constant war of disinformation, the lies in which our profession is steeped, the repression meted out for deviating from the official orthodoxy, and the manipulation to which they are subjected to make them believe that by staying «up to date» with the latest developments, they are practising good medicine.^[100] This very same battle, which has been waged against us by generations of homeopaths, has now taken on a global dimension.

Science is a powerful tool in the quest for truth, but when it is corrupted by money, the misleading notion of «scientific proof» emerges – an oxymoron designed to sell anything from a trip on the Titanic to a vaccine.

It is likely that never before in its history has humanity faced such a threat – not because of a deadly virus, but because of a simple cold that is being used as a pretext to establish an oligarchic tyranny. If someone were to tell me that you set fire to your house because there was a mosquito in the living room, that would prove either that you are completely mad, or that the mosquito is merely serving as an excuse for the arsonist. Similarly, the measures apparently The insane measures taken in unison by (almost) all governments in the face of a non-existent threat only make sense if we change our perspective and realise that Governments no longer act in the interests of their people and nations, but according to the agenda of a higher authority that controls them all:

:.

Global financial trends and statements point to a seismic overhaul of governance and financial systems that is unfolding beneath the surface of the Covid-19 pandemic and extends far beyond the realm of public health.

Strengthening centralised control can create an unbridgeable gulf between a small handful of winners and a majority of losers. ….

Evidence suggests that coronavirus vaccines, which are effectively Trojan horses, could call into question bodily integrity and informed consent in an entirely new way, by introducing invasive technologies into people’s brains and bodies.

Technologies such as brain-machine interfaces, digital identity tracking devices and crypto-compatible chipswould contribute to the central bank’s objective of replacing currencies with digital transaction and identification systems and creating a global control grid that links the world’s population to the military-pharmaceutical intelligence cloud of global technocrats. Furthermore, the use of vaccines as a vehicle for surveillance technologies negates any legal liability.^[101]

So be it — or perhaps that’s just as well? — if I upset those who are still slumbering comfortably in the cosiness of the system’s orthodoxy and who are only too happy to march off to the slaughterhouse singing. I’ve never been one to mince my words — any more than Dr Zelenko^[102] or Dr Sucharit Bhakdi^[103] or Dr Michael Yeadon^[104] whose analysis I fully endorse here: beyond being a mere heinous crime aimed at the industry’s boundless enrichment, it is probably a global genocide which is being prepared in an atmosphere of joy and carefree abandon, with the consent — or rather, the submission — of a large section of the population.

Let there be no mistake: the meaning of the word «genocide» is ingrained in my very being; the neologism was coined by Lemkin taking the Armenian genocide as his model. When his law lecturer explained to him that governments could do whatever they liked with the people under their rule, just as one does with a flock of chickens, Lemkin exclaimed, «But people aren’t chickens! » I envy France when it mourns Oradour. We have experienced thousands of such events in the course of systematic extermination, regardless of age or gender.”.

It is therefore in the full sense of the term that I declare that, as we uncover the effects and contents of the «vaccines» forcibly imposed by governments against all science and reason, we have evidence of an attempt at genocide. I do not know what proportion of humanity will survive these poisons. Complaints before the International Criminal Court^[105],^[106] have been filed in India. Lawyer Dipali Ojha,^[107] the lead lawyer for the Indian Bar Association, has brought criminal proceedings against Dr Swaminathan «for every death» caused by his actions, but given the levels of corruption and organised crime, it is suspected that the chances of success are slim.

Given the perversity — a term that will recur frequently in my comments — that we see wherever we look, Tocqueville alone seems to me to have clearly described such a situation:

‘The Spaniards, resorting to unprecedented atrocities and bringing upon themselves an indelible shame, were unable to exterminate the indigenous peoples, nor even to prevent them from sharing in their rights; the Americans of the United States have achieved this twofold result with marvellous ease, quietly, lawfully, humanely, without shedding blood, without violating a single one of the great principles of morality in the eyes of the world. One could not destroy human beings whilst showing greater respect for the laws of humanity.”^[108] »

I accuse!

I accuse the globalists — this tiny minority comprising a handful of prominent families (the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Carnegies, DuPonts, Bushes, Morgans, etc., and their leading figures such as Bezos, Soros and Gates)^[109] :

• That they are, for the most part, dangerous psychopaths^[110] who crave nothing but perverse pleasure or the worst possible transgressions in order to feel alive.^[111]
• To have gradually monopolised the creation of money throughout the world^[112] since at least the fall of the First Empire.^[113]
• To have thus controlled the destinies of nations since at least the end of the 19th century, orchestrating, for their own gain, the wars or revolutions they deem useful^[114] : The Boer War, the First World War, the Russian Revolution and the establishment of Communism,^[115] etc.
• To have been hatching a global conspiracy for generations, with a view to establishing global governance^[116] in the form of oligarchic collectivism^[117] of which China serves as the model — as early as 30 March 2020, Gordon Brown was calling for an «interim» world government, whilst Attali was calling for a world government based in Jerusalem^[118],
• To have been waging a secret global war against the Peoples for generations^[119] and to exploit nations by forcing states into fictitious debt in exchange for the creation of money out of nothing.
• Of having fabricated the Covid pandemic from scratch.^[120],^[121],^[122],^[123],^[124],^[125]
• Having patented — through a host of companies, including the CDC, Pfizer, Moderna, Merck and Johnson & Johnson — every aspect of the SARS-CoV-2 genome for at least 20 years in order to achieve their objectives,^[126],[127]
• To have been warning of the pandemic for years in a highly perverse manner^[128] through a number of spokespersons, including Bill Gates^[129] who appears to be the high priest of the system.^[130],[131] Suddenly proclaiming himself an expert on all global issues and a virologist, the man whom history will no doubt regard as one of the greatest criminals of all time was telling us, as early as February 2020, that there would be no return to normality unless the entire planet had been vaccinated.^[132],^[133]
• To resort to social engineering without scruples^[134],^[135] —a purely communist concept— to crimes against humanity and, probably, to global genocide, in order to shape the «new man» — a temptation that has always been the hallmark of totalitarian regimes —, stemming from their former eugenic delusions and transhumanist.^[136],^[137],^[138]
• To ruin the global economy in order to impose a future digital currency^[139] and total technocratic control^[140] of the [remaining…] population who were enslaved.^[141] Every effort will be made to present a world government as the only solution for «saving the banks».»
• To organise the destruction — the undermining — of the foundations of society^[142], notably through Soros’s Open Society,^[143] and systemic corruption that is so pervasive and widespread that it is impossible to fully grasp its extent.^[144],^[145] All it took, then, was for Tedros to declare the pandemic^[146],^[147] —Gates’s front man— so that everything would set in motion like a cascade of dominoes, as all nations that are signatories to the WHO’s International Health Regulations are legally obliged to follow whatever the Director-General decides to do in the event of an emergency.^[148] The whole affair was orchestrated in advance according to a plan that commands admiration: by passing off a common cold as the Black Death, the corrupt knew they could then count on widespread cowardice and a shirking of all responsibility to drag the rest of the world down with them.
• Having infiltrated and taken control of virtually all governments, and all international and national bodies, whether official (such as the WHO, the World Bank, GAVI, etc.) or unofficial (Freemasonry, which has been perverted into a political party, such as the Grand Orient in France) ^[149],[150] and to own virtually all industrial, banking and technology firms.^[151]
• Not even bothering to conceal their aims any longer, but spreading their doctrine through organisations such as the World Economic Forum^[152] —his boss and mentor, Klaus Schwab, who is also a Rothschild^[153], the Fabian Society or other journals such as The Economist. The usual strategy of using the window by Overton to gradually accustom the public’s mindset to what would previously have been unimaginable.

I accuse the three areas of crime the increasingly intertwined sectors — Big Finance, Big Tech and Big Pharma — to reap the benefits of the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’, whilst benefiting from close ties with the military intelligence apparatus^[154],[155] . This has led to the greatest transfer of wealth in human history and a massive rise in the power of global technocracy, a form of centralised, expert-led control over the production and consumption of resources, which the Wall Street Journal has described as «undemocratic rule by elites who think they know better».»^[156]

I accuse the pharmaceutical companies —notably Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca—have, since the beginning of the 20th century, constituted the worst criminal organisations the world has ever known:

• For having filed thousands of patents relating to the coronavirus since 2000, and for having prepared and planned the current crisis in collusion with the Gates, Fauci and Tedros troika. The SARS-CoV-2 genome has thus been patented for many years, along with all known variants of the spike protein (despite their unlimited resources, these gentlemen still managed to make the blunder of filing the patent for the future vaccine just a few hours before filing the patent for the coronavirus itself).^[157]
• For having caused the closure of all homeopathic hospitals^[158] in the USA as early as the 1910s and imposed chemical medicine in the form we know today, undermining human health for generations.
• To be obsessed with destroying homeopathy, the only logical and scientific medical system capable of overshadowing them and curing people
• To have waged a relentless war against homeopathy for the past hundred years in order to discredit it^[159] and to hold a monopoly over a non-scientific form of medicine based on the arbitrary administration of petrochemical drugs, guided by statistics that are consistently falsified.

I accuse the troika Gates — through his «philanthropic» foundation» Bill and Melinda and other associates such as Open Society Soros’s and the Clinton Foundation, Fauci^[160] — having gained control of the CDC, he now finds himself accused of having taken measures that run counter to ethical standards and scientific knowledge,^[161] Tedros —with its firm grip on the WHO, to act as the executors of a scheme that has been patiently prepared—a global heist—for at least two decades, resulting in a staggering web of intrigue involving virtually every sector^[162] — with the invaluable assistance of the Chinese Communist Party^[163] including, in particular:

• Tinkering with the definition of a pandemic as early as 2009^[164]
• Governments’ obligation to comply with WHO decisions in the event of a pandemic
• Infiltration of all international organisations such as the UN, the World Bank, etc.
• The laundering of dirty money through a constellation of NGOs and other foundations — such as those orbiting the UN — that are accountable to no one.^[165]
• Total control of the media (ANP, AFP, REUTERS, which are themselves affiliated with European Journalism Centre and Project Syndicate, which, like the rest of the world, are owned by companies such as Black Rock, Vanguard, Street State or Berkshire Hathaway) and social media through their accomplices. Take, for example, the ten billionaires in France who control the entire press.^[166]

I accuse our rulers of acting in complete collusion with globalists and of conspiring against peace by creating an irreconcilable rift within the population through discriminatory measures that violate all democratic constitutions^[167] —citizens who do, in fact, pay their social security contributions are being refused entry to hospital (something unheard of in living memory), reports are pouring in against those who fail to wear masks properly and have the audacity to enter a shop, whilst the unvaccinated are being refused evacuation^[168], unspeakable police brutality is being meted out to people on the pretext that they are not wearing masks^[169], etc.

I Accuse the entire political establishment —with very few exceptions— in collusion with the governments in power. Their deafening silence whilst all democratic principles are violated on a daily basis demonstrates their guilt, and is a sign of the long-standing decay of our societies, where democracy has been reduced to mere theatre featuring a controlled opposition.

I accuse all those pathetic individuals belonging to various aspects of society and who have done everything in their power to impose the new established order: the Medical Association, judges and other magistrates, the police, trade unions, etc.

• Special mention must be made here of the cowardice of the vast majority of doctors who slavishly accepted the government’s directives, whilst knowing full well how absurd they were. In doing so, they betrayed their patients’ trust, whilst bringing upon themselves a shame that will be difficult to erase.

All these people, from top to bottom, will have to answer, along with their globalist masters, for the following charges:

• Global conspiracy and organised fraud
• Crimes against humanity (denial of medical care to the population, murder of elderly people, forced injection of experimental substances in breach of international law,^[170] the right to refuse treatment, and all ethical considerations^[171])
• Crimes against the economy (the deliberate destruction of entire sectors of the economy, making victims dependent on the «aid» provided and blackmailing them into voting a certain way — this is the same dynamic as that between a violent, alcoholic husband and his wife —, organised shortages, massive inflation, particularly of cereal products^[172])
• Crime against society:
  • Social engineering,
  • Discrimination,^[173] which constitutes the first step towards exclusion and then extermination, as it is easy to predict that every effort will be made to pin the blame on the unvaccinated — the situation will soon become catastrophic, whether due to the harmful effects of the vaccines or simply because of the emergence of new variants, whether natural or not. Austria, the birthplace of a notorious painter, has just decided to lock down the unvaccinated!^[174]«Over the months, as vaccination policy became increasingly authoritarian, the unvaccinated have come to be seen as a kind of separate category of citizen, reduced to their serological status and constantly demonised by the authorities, who have made them the scapegoats for the crisis.» Mathieu Slama
  • Agnotology (the systematic production of stupidity and ignorance)
  • 
  • (fear, doubt and misinformation), the poster opposite illustrates this point well^[175]
  • The systematic destruction of all points of reference — just as Solzhenitsyn had foretold in his famous speech at Harvard^[176],
  • «Cancel culture» and other absurdities such as gender theory.

The way out of the crisis will require a fundamental societal revolution, involving a re-evaluation of the role of industry – particularly in the field of medicine – and a re-examination of the concept unlimited personal development introduced by Voltaire.^[177] Rousseau, for his part, had clearly realised that:

In a monarchy, a private individual’s wealth can never place him above the will of the sovereign. In a republic, on the other hand, it can easily place him above the law.

Only a popular uprising will put the globalists and their accomplices out of action. These hyenas, who have always been operating in the shadows, are nothing but paper tigers, future victims of the gallows, and the people forced to be inoculated with poisons are now acting in self-defence. May the righteous anger of the abused peoples rise up!

‘For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.’ Eph 6:12

Just to give us food for thought, let us consider that the French beheaded an innocent king who sought nothing but the happiness of his people. What shall we make of a Macron, a lackey of the globalists, who is deliberately poisoning the French people?

Louis XVI’s final words on the scaffold – «And you, unfortunate people» – ring in our ears like a painful prophecy. This will be the title of our next chapter.

We must put an end to globalism!^[178]

1. David Rockefeller at the Bilderberg meeting in Baden, Germany, in June 1991. Rockefeller devoted his life to a single world government, that is to say, the New World Order (NWO). He founded the Trilateral Commission and is an integral part of the Council on Foreign Relations. ↑
2. For those who would like to find out more about the Armenian Genocide, the website « Not subject to a limitation period » is a benchmark. ↑
3. For to know what the fate and condition of the dimmi in the Islamic world. ↑
4. See the 1793 Declaration of the Rights of Man – Chapter 35: «When the government violates the rights of the people, insurrection is, for the people and for every section of the people, the most sacred of rights and the most indispensable of duties». ↑
5. Watch the documentary *Hold-Up* by Pierre Barnerias and Philippe Cossé. My full interview in HD, here. ↑
6. See the article by our excellent Nicole Delepine: Fear based on a common cold epidemic. The colossal errors in the simulations by N. Ferguson and the Pasteur Institute have shown us this, and so there is no objective reason to fear the future.Even if Covid behaved like the flu, with recurrences and a new variant every year, there would be no reason to fear it. Every day, the vaccines prove their lack of effectiveness, but early treatment is effective both preventatively and curatively, as India has demonstrated. Do not be afraid any longer. ↑
7. See the article in *Le Courrier des Stratèges* and the PDF of the report here. ↑
8. From 2003 to 2009, a pandemic was defined as the emergence of ‘ several simultaneous outbreaks around the world, resulting in a large number of deaths and cases of illness »; a change was made between the 1st^er and on 9 May 2009, removing the criterion of seriousness. The content of the WHO’s web pages has been amended, without changing the date displayed. For its part, the WHO states that the basic definition of a pandemic has never changed. Quoted by Mr Tom Jefferson during his hearing before the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Family of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on 29 March 2010, Ms Nathalie Boudou, a WHO spokesperson, justified the change to the definition on the WHO website as a correction to a ‘ error ", stating that the correct definition of a pandemic should refer to the emergence of outbreaks in at least two regions of the world, but had nothing to do with the severity of the disease or the number of deaths. See the pdf. ↑
9. Most cases responded well, leading to a recovery within a few days of taking the treatment Ammonium Carbonicum, the leading treatment for the epidemic, identified as early as April 2020. Together with our students, we have recorded more than a hundred cases that have been successfully treated, at any stage of the condition. ↑
10. See the Figaro. ↑
11. See the result of the Senate committee. ↑
12. See the forgery of the study, which was never published in the mainstream media, and of course no measures taken against homeopathy were called into question… ↑
13. Behind this bogus study – indirectly funded by Bill Gates’ shell companies and a London hospital – was the firm Quartz Clinical and its marketing and sales director, a certain Ariane Anderson. To be the marketing and sales director of a company that produces a global study on the dangers of a medicine that has been taken by billions of people (up to 1 billion tablets a year have been sold worldwide) is certainly a position of considerable responsibility! The company behind the Lancet ‘article’, the Big Data company that provided the observational «data» for the study… does not exist !It’s a completely bogus company. It is said to have been set up in 2007 by Sapan Desai, one of the authors of the article, and has never carried out any business, has never paid any tax, and is said to have been wound up or suspended on several occasions. See the article in RR.One might think that this lady must be brimming with qualifications and that her professional experience must put Dr Raoult and the leading Chinese experts – who dared to praise the therapeutic effects of this drug – to shame. You’ll find plenty of photos of the lady in various states of undress on the internet. However, the «best» ones have already been taken down… See here. ↑
14. A study recently published Italian book relating to A study of 3,451 hospitalised patients revealed 301 fewer deaths, which was better than that reported for the very expensive remdesivir used in hospitals, which Fauci has praised. A study the earlier, smaller Italian version a showed a reduction of 66% in deaths among hospitalised patients. A study Belgian relating to a study of 8,075 hospitalised patients revealed a reduction of 65%. Similarly, a study A recent report from Saudi Arabia revealed 43% fewer hospitalisations and 45% fewer ICU admissions. For high-risk patients in care homes in Spain, the HCQ halved the risk of a poor outcome. A large study of the Henry Ford Hospital System a revealed a mortality rate among 2,541 patients of 13.5% for HCQ alone, 20.1% for HCQ plus azithromycin, and 26.4% for neither. ↑
15. A yet another disgrace for the Pasteur Institute, which nevertheless remains faithful to its founder’s model of pseudo-science. The rigged study, pre-published in June, was deleted – as if by magic! Quite simply! No need for peer review! (The Investor Without a Suit he did, however, take great care to preserve it là (for those who aren’t put off by a scientific text in English.) ↑
16. See, in this regard, the remarkable work of popularisation and synthesis carried out by Odon Lafontaine in his The Great Secret of Islam. ↑
17. Here is Fuellmich’s own summary—the same : «The fact is that PCR tests, as a method of measuring infections, are not only scientifically absurd, but have apparently been deliberately designed to generate as many false positives as possible, and thus to spread panic around the world.”. This is demonstrated by a retraction letter written by 22 highly respected international scientists, calling on the journal’s editor to immediately retract these absurdities. It has been viewed around 18 million times to date.» « Furthermore, Drosten’s claim that asymptomatic infections exist is also false. Because there is no such thing, as a large-scale study from Wuhan involving 10 million people has recently proven.»« A person who shows no symptoms is in good health — whatever the good Doctor Knock may say. This means that none of us should be afraid of people who show no symptoms and force them to wear masks, nor should we be afraid that a positive test result necessarily means they are infected. The horrific images of hospitals with beds in the corridors, which are now resurfacing, actually occur every year during the perfectly normal flu season. They are now being used deliberately to further fuel panic. There is still no excess mortality in Germany. More people die in winter: it is tragic, but unfortunately it is ‘normal’.» «So what is this really all about if there is no health issue that differs from the usual flu season? In this regard, we have been able to form an opinion based on the hearings that have taken place, as well as additional information.». ↑
18. See here the official FDA PDF. It states that « Given that no quantified isolates of the 2019-nCoV virus were available for use by the CDC at the time the test was developed and this study was conducted, the tests designed to detect 2019-nCoV RNA were validated using characterised stocks of full-length RNA transcribed in vitro (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titre (RNA copies/µL), which was added to a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and a viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic a clinical sample. “Another revelation in the document is the FDA’s admission that test results are ‘pooled’ to produce inaccurate figures. The FDA is literally fabricating data as part of the pandemic narrative, and all of this is revealed in the document. See also the excellent article by FDA.News : “An FDA document admits that the “Covid” PCR test was developed without using isolated Covid samples for test calibration, effectively admitting that it is testing for something else” ↑
19. Nicole Delépine has written another excellent article on PCR here. She states: «In conclusion, confirmation that PCR tests are unreliable and should under no circumstances be used by governments as evidence of the «pandemic» comes from the FDA itself. It is high time our leaders returned to the traditional methods of assessing epidemics: counting the number of people who are ill and the number of deaths from the disease.» ↑
20. Read the article here. ↑
21. See the article by France Soir (one of the few newspapers to have upheld journalistic ethics). See the feature on KLA.TV Drosten, which is truly appalling, given that this criminal even falsely claimed to be a doctor, as revealed by Fuellmich. ↑
22. See in Times: «Testing firm stands to profit from the sale of Covid swabs”. It is therefore possible that one of the aims of antigen testing is the widespread surveillance of the population. The globalists are decades ahead of us. ↑
23. France Soir, RT and Sud Radio deserve our utmost admiration. They are probably the only media organisations that uphold the principles of journalism and the Munich Charter, which calls, amongst other things, for the gathering, analysis and verification of information from all sources in order to provide readers with impartial reporting. ↑
24. In Belgium, for example, *La Libre* offered its readers a short guide on how to spot and deal with nasty conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, on Facebook, it was impossible to mention even the address www.adrreports.eu, the official European website for mortality statistics ↑
25. See Naomi Klein’s *The Shock Doctrine*. Don’t miss this video. ↑
26. “Whether they have a say or not, the people can always be made to bow to the demands of those in power. It’s easy. All you have to do is tell them they are under attack and denounce the pacifists for their lack of patriotism and for the risk they pose to the country. It works the same way in any country.” Hermann Goering. ↑
27. On 14 October, a meeting The event with Barbara Stiegler was organised by the Mollat bookshop in Bordeaux to mark the publication of her book *Nietzsche and Life: A New History of Philosophy*, published by Gallimard. The philosopher presented her book and offered a very interesting analysis of the way in which the term «conspiracy theory» is exploited to silence dissent. ↑
28. There are countless examples. I shall simply quote here the article by L’Express which disparages Ms Wonner, who is photographed from the least flattering angle possible. It is a classic example of its kind. ↑
29. We owe this witty remark to Christian Greiling, the remarkable author of, amongst other things, the blog *Les* Chronicles of the Great Game. ↑
30. Le Monde prides itself on having published the ‘Manifesto of the 343’ at the time, but refuses to publish any opinion piece by discussion on vaccination. The examples are endless. ↑
31. Let’s briefly mention here the pedants such as The side profile, the sceptical circles. Mr Buisseret embodies this phenomenon better than anyone: with no scientific training to his name and having produced nothing but a pitiful film, he is convinced he is to become the arbiter of scientific elegance. What a fall from grace! ↑
32. See, for example, this article, for those who weren’t lucky enough to experience these events «live» in Romania. ↑
33. «COVID-19 – from myth to statistics», anonymous author, 9 February 2021, direct link, archived link. Let us consider how many additional deaths we would have had to mourn between 2015 and 2019 if, during those years, we had experienced the same mortality rates as in 2020, excluding COVID-19. The following table takes into account deaths reported as «COVID-19» in hospitals and care homes, but not at home [47–50, 54, 56]:
    

    year	excess mortality
    2015	-49036
    2016	-33159
    2017	-33947
    2018	-25693
    2019	-1762

    Seasonal flu? Gone! Tens of thousands of people would not have died if, between 2015 and 2019, we had denied elderly people access to hospitals, discouraged the sick from seeking medical advice, significantly reduced the use of medicines and brought the economy to a standstill for months on end. It makes you wonder whether the health authorities weren’t completely mad not to have scrapped the entire public health system sooner. Thanks to COVID-19, France experienced a golden age of healthcare in 2020 that was completely unheard of before 17 March 2020. Should we conclude that COVID-19, the lockdowns, the curfews, the neglect of care, the cuts to hospital beds, the mistreatment of doctors, the tormented populations, the traumatised children, the ruined shopkeepers and the curtailed individual freedoms have succeeded in defeating cancer, flu, diabetes, high blood pressure, multiple sclerosis – in short, all diseases except COVID-19? See the article Read the full article here. ↑

34. A study recently published Italian book relating to A study of 3,451 hospitalised patients revealed 301 fewer deaths, which was better than that reported pour le remdesivir très coûteux dans les hôpitaux, vanté par Fauci. Une study the earlier, smaller Italian version a révélé une réduction de 66% des décès chez les patients hospitalisés. Une study Belgian relating to sur 8 075 patients hospitalisés a révélé une réduction de 65%. De même, une study récente d’Arabie saoudite a révélé 43% d’hospitalisations en moins et 45% d’admissions en USI en moins. Pour les patients à haut risque des maisons de retraite en Spain, the HCQ halved the risk of a poor outcome. A large study of the Henry Ford Hospital System a revealed a mortality rate among 2,541 patients of 13.5% for HCQ alone, 20.1% for HCQ plus azithromycin, and 26.4% for neither. ↑
35. Read the full article on the website of AIMSIB. In India 97%: rapid recovery from the Delta variant. In we, the Riviera-Chablais on-call service, which had been treating Covid patients with ivermectin from January 2021 until last week, the positive treatment results touted on Facebook led to those in charge at La Providence being summoned to appear before the HRC Medical Committee, comprising all the heads of department, the medical director and the dean. The result: despite a record of 350 to 400 patients cured to date, ivermectin is now banned. ↑
36. For example, the data Sentinels (711 GPs and 70 paediatricians in private practice) show an incidence rate of 24 per 100,000 in week 10! The SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate for week 10^th The weekly rate for 2021 is 24 cases per 100,000, not 700 (Alpes-Maritimes) or 900 (Dunkirk) as the government claims in order to scare everyone!The trend has remained fairly stable since mid-November across all age groups, according to this report, which is based on data that has now been consolidated over the past four months. This figure corresponds to 16.177 new cases for the whole of week 10, which works out at 2,311 per day across France as a whole, and not the 40.000 reported cases! ↑
37. See the remarkable article on the Anthropologiques website. ↑
38. Philippe Édouard (Prime Minister), «Decree No. 2020-360 of 28 March 2020 supplementing Decree No. 2020-293 of 23 March 2020 prescribing the general measures necessary to tackle the Covid-19 epidemic within the framework of the public health state of emergency», Official Journal of the French Republic, Laws and Decrees, No. 77, Text 11, 33–34 (29 March 2020), link to the Légifrance website. ↑
39. Until November 2020, the WHO acknowledged that Immunity can be acquired through infection or vaccination; on 13 November 2020, the WHO stated that herd immunity within a population can only be achieved through vaccination and not through natural infection ! This was reaffirmed on 31 December 2020 in relation to Covid-19, whilst acknowledging that we do not know the level of vaccination coverage required to achieve this herd immunity! It should be noted that only the definition dated 31 December 2020 is still accessible, the previous ones can be seen in the screenshot below)In a recent publication, the Johns Hopkins Institute refers only to vaccine-induced immunity in a discussion of the hypothetical herd immunity that might be expected against Covid (2). Even the Wall Street Journal, which is incredibly pro-vaccine, recently published an article on this subject. Usually, the WSJ leaves its articles on the opinions page for about a week. But in less than 24 hours, the WSJ had buried this article on natural immunity. The WSJ article discusses mucosal immunity as opposed to systemic immunity. The author (a neurologist) claims that whilst vaccines boost systemic immunity, they do nothing for mucosal immunity. ↑
40. Immunity natural is, to put it mildly, 13 times higher than that attributed to the vaccine. « A new Israeli study suggests that natural infection offers far better protection against the Delta variant than vaccines, despite the fact that Americans had been told that vaccines offered better protection than natural infection. Dr Anthony Fauci and the rest of President Biden’s COVID advisers have once again proved themselves wrong regarding the ‘science’ of COVID vaccines. The study was described by Bloomberg as “the largest real-world analysis comparing natural immunity – acquired through a previous infection – with the protection provided by one of the most potent vaccines currently in use”. » ↑
41. Consider the sickening propaganda that has been relentlessly peddled to all nations by the media acting on orders. For example, in France: « Towards A return to normal by winter 2021? That is what the vaccine manufacturer BioNTech claims”; “ Covid-19 : »When will we be able to get back to normal life, thanks to the vaccine?«; ‘ For a »For the majority of the population, a return to normal life depends on vaccination, according to a study«; " Covid-19 – ‘Towards a return to normality in autumn 2021 “if we manage to vaccinate 80–90 per cent of the French population”, according to Professor Fontanet’; ‘ Covid-19 : ‘A year on from lockdown, when can we expect a return to ’normal»?« ; «“’ Without »Without a vaccine, there will be no return to normal in sport,» warns Roxana Maracineanu" ↑
42. See the terrible testimonial of this funeral director. ↑
43. Don’t miss out on the study A bogus study commissioned by Veran to back up his own claims. The study covers 7.2 million French people aged over 75, even though there are only 6,200,000 such people in the country. The genuine investigative journalists at *France Soir* conducted their own investigation and have found an explanation for the mysterious million: 1.1 million vaccines are said to have been counted and matched twice. Not all Covid hospitalisations have been taken into account. According to the study, a total of 26,000 people were hospitalised with Covid between 11 February and 20 July; however, according to Geodes, the figure for the relevant categories during the same period is eight times higher: 80% Covid hospitalisations have disappeared… ↑
44. Moderna has therefore concealed 300,000 serious side effects. The leak originated from an employee of the subcontractor responsible for processing the declarations. ↑
45. When someone dies within 60 or 28 days of testing positive for Covid-19 – even if the test result was false – they are automatically classified as a Covid-19 death to inflate the figures. But when young, healthy people die a few hours after being vaccinated, these deaths are regarded as mere coincidences. ↑
46. I would refer the reader to the website Meaning and Symbols by the excellent Dr Olivier Soulier. To quote him: «In each of these countries that carried out mass vaccination from December or early January, a previously unseen spike in mortality was observed. At first, I thought it was simply a coincidence. But since then, this observation has been confirmed almost everywhere in the world! We have even seen several countries, such as Cambodia, which had virtually no Covid deaths… until they began vaccinating their population:The roll-out of the vaccination programme in Cambodia in February–March was followed by a spike in deaths, even though the country had previously been spared by Covid. The same phenomenon occurred in Gibraltar, a small British territory that vaccinated its population on an even larger scale than Israel: whilst there had been only 10 Covid deaths in total in 2020, Gibraltar recorded 44 Covid deaths in two weeks, right in the middle of its vaccination campaign.(Speaking of Gibraltar, it has been over a month and a half since 100 per 1,000 of the population were fully vaccinated with two doses – something Emmanuel Macron can only dream of… and yet, there are currently 23 cases there, which is the equivalent of 45,000 cases a day in France!). All in all, there is no doubt that the vaccine initially makes the situation worse before [possibly—Ed.] having a positive effect on severe cases. In a risk-benefit analysis of the vaccine, this must absolutely be taken into account! The vaccine efficacy figures presented to you in the media are completely skewed, because the risk of infection is only assessed after two doses! However, this excludes from the calculation all those who were infected between the first and second doses as a result of the vaccine! This is yet another reason why the «95% protection» figure (%) that is constantly drummed into you is purely fictitious; the vaccine’s efficacy is certainly much lower! ↑
47. The VAERS data published today by the CDC show a total of 545,338 reports of adverse reactions, across all age groups, following COVID vaccination, including 12,366 deaths and 70,105 serious adverse events between 14 December 2020 and 30 July 2021. See here. ↑
48. See the video from the MP. Mathilde Panot elegantly tears Macron’s camp to shreds, and there’s really no way to counter her arguments, given just how crazy the situation is. ↑
49. Pfizer and BioNTech are therefore reported to have secured a commercial contract incredibly advantageous for them. The pretext of the COVID-19 pandemic would have allowed them to be absolved of all liability and to avoid compensating victims of adverse effects during this Phase 3 clinical trial in the general population. Governments will bear the cost of compensation unless they can prove that the pharmaceutical company acted with wilful misconduct or that the products were defective. On this last point, it will be virtually impossible, given the numerous defences the pharmaceutical company could put forward: a break in the cold chain, an error during dilution, the use of three doses when the protocol only specifies two, mixing different COVID-19 vaccines currently on the market, failure to observe the required interval between the two doses… ↑
50. The European Commissioner received millions in bribes to sign the Pfizer contracts. The matter was hushed up as quickly as possible and only RT keeps a page on the subject. It’s all absolutely appalling. ↑
51. See the remarkable study from the Stalk Institute. Scientists have known for some time that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by attaching themselves to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that the virus’s spike proteins (which behave very differently from those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself. The paper, published on 30 April 2021, in Traffic Research, also provides conclusive evidence that COVID-19 is a vascular disease, demonstrating exactly how the SARS-CoV-2 virus damages and attacks the vascular system at a cellular level. The findings help to explain the wide variety of seemingly unrelated complications associated with COVID-19, and could pave the way for new research into more effective treatments. ’A lot of people think of it as a respiratory disease, but it’s really a vascular disease,“ says Assistant Research Professor Uri Manor, who is a co-senior author of the study. ↑
52. Spike is found on the surface of endothelial cells, which likely explains why the severe effects immediately following the injections are probably linked to vascular damage. As a result, a very large number of patients test positive for D-dimers: billions of capillaries are affected, leading to the formation of clots. Brain, spinal and cardiac tissues are directly attacked. In the lungs, we will soon see numerous cases of pulmonary hypertension, ultimately leading to right-sided heart failure. See here A French doctor’s account. ↑
53. It would be worthwhile to take a look at Dr Hoffe’s work to set out in detail the effects of the vaccine that pharmaceutical companies and governments will go to great lengths to conceal. ↑
54. In this video, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D., and several of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency as early as the beginning of 2021 of the potential risk of blood clots and cerebral venous thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections.In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the issue, why it is not limited to products that have already been suspended, and why, in the long term, we could end up creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subjects. ↑
55. See Dr Fleming at Rumble. “ ” Add the Pfizer vaccine and the red blood cells lose their ability to carry oxygen, and the red blood cells start to clot…. This is exactly what we are seeing in the VAERS reports. This is exactly what we are seeing with neurological and cardiac damage, and the blood clots forming in the body. This is proof that these vaccines cause this kind of damage at a microscopic level, simply by being added to a human’s blood… I think it’s time the FDA and the CDC did their jobs instead of just going through the motions.” ↑
56. View the articles now many following the Fifth Column who uncovered the truth. See Graphene-based “neuromodulation” technology is REAL: A press release from INBRAIN Neuroelectronics describes brain-controlled biocircuits using AI-powered graphene. Those interested in graphene will find that this is not a new topic:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03602559.2018.1542714?journalCode=lpte21https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379677914001441https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/5.0009186https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0008622312000644https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2015/ra/c4ra12591f/unauth#!divAbstracthttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272884216301584https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433215008193https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167577X11007531

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167577X13007933 ↑

57. See this video such as *The Fifth Column*, for example. ↑
58. See here Dr Zalewski’s paper – he does not appear to be a charlatan. Some vaccine vials are said to contain nothing but saline solution, whilst others are said to be «loaded». ↑
59. See how the share price is performing Cellectis for example. ↑
60. See here Dr Peter McCullough’s presentation. ↑
61. See on AIMSIB: vaccination of contact topics, and the Buchwald effect. See also the article as follows: «In the field of public health, sweeping, draconian and intuitive solutions rarely yield the hoped-for results. Will our brilliant elites learn from past mistakes, or will they fall back into the same old rut?» ↑
62. Just to remind you: it was not vaccination that led to the eradication of smallpox, but lockdown. See the report from the WHO, from which I shall now quote some extracts. The case fatality rate of this terrible disease is in no way comparable to that of Covid-19:The report acknowledges that «mass vaccination has failed» and that it is surveillance and containment that have proved successful:Like this:Here again, «eradication campaigns relying entirely or mainly on mass vaccination were successful in a few countries but failed in most cases.» We also read: «In Java, despite vaccination rates exceeding 90%, transmission continued in densely populated areas… until effective case detection and surveillance systems were fully in place.» ↑
63. See Dr Eric Ancelet’s excellent book, *Pour en finir avec Pasteur: Un siècle de mystification scientifique*.« ↑
64. L. Pasteur, Letter to Pedro II, Emperor of Brazil, 22 September 1884, National Archives, AB/XIX/3332. ↑
65. The risk of a child dying from Covid is virtually zero. Widespread corruption has just given the green light to Pfizer to vaccinate children aged 5 to 11. We shudder to think what might happen next. We’re in the midst of a nightmare. ↑
66. The parallel with the recruitment of the Hitler Youth is becoming increasingly striking, which in itself shows us how the dictatorship is advancing. Here are two children proudly showing off their injection sites, delighted to be able to protect others! ↑
67. See the BMJ study here. See also the excellent article from the AIMSIB on the vaccination of pregnant women. Most trials also excluded pregnant and breastfeeding volunteers, as well as those suffering from chronic and serious conditions such as tuberculosis, hepatitis C, autoimmune disorders, coagulopathies, cancer and immunosuppression. There is obviously no point in vaccinating; my personal view is that this vaccine must also be causing numerous miscarriages. Note that the federal authorities have declared that pregnant women are among the vulnerable, as always by cherry-picking studies. We’ve sunk to yet another new low. ↑
68. See here the list of fines imposed on these criminal organisations since the year 2000. ↑
69. The pharmaceutical company Pfizer probably began production of its mRNA Covid-19 vaccine well before obtaining Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 from the European Union regarding the lifting of protection for its citizens against GMOs, and even beforeit had commenced its Phase III clinical trials, confident that it could secure marketing authorisation worldwide by enlisting the help of the former Commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Scott Gottlieb, whom it had recently recruited.The vaccine technology used is in its infancy in terms of scientific understanding and involves numerous uncertainties regarding side effects beyond six months, none of which have been studied. Coronaviruses mutate significantly, and numerous variants of the original SARS-CoV-2 are already circulating globally, rendering the idea of a single vaccine effective against all its current or future forms a pipe dream.Financial liability for serious post-vaccination effects caused by these vaccines has been readily shifted onto the purchasing states, which raises fears of a complete lack of caution and transparency on the part of all manufacturers, who will seek to market their products as quickly as possible in this race for financial gain, given that these firms« adherence to ethical standards has long been regarded as non-existent. Many voices from civil society are already speaking out to call for vaccination that is either compulsory or segregational, relegating those not vaccinated against Covid to the status of second-class citizens, without any awareness of the financial manipulation they are perpetuating, at the obvious expense of human health and civil peace.The clinical studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine should draw the reader’s attention to a highly unusual detail: both Pfizer and Moderna refer to »observer-blind« trials. Usually, the term »double-blind’ is used, and a Google search will convince you that this term is virtually absent from the literature. That is rather strange.PfizerModerna

    Here I must mention Dr Siegrist’s confusing response to my question, as he tried to convince me that this was a duplicate — but in that case, why not state it as such? — whilst telling me that the trial had been unblinded for the testers. Are we therefore being asked to believe in a double-blind trial when there has been «unblinding»? For Dr Michel de Lorgeril, whom I regard as one of our leading specialists in statistics and clinical trials, the The answer is clear : this is not a double-blind study and, as a result, the placebo effects are significant; both studies – those by Pfizer and Moderna – are deeply biased.

    Peter Doshi, in a an outstanding article and unmissable, this piece highlights what looks very much like a clever cover-up of the Pfizer trial, thanks to the additional data provided by the company to the FDA. The haphazard grouping of participants and arbitrary exclusions all smack of fraud.

    Doshi writes, for example:

    “All attention has been focused on the spectacular efficacy results: Pfizer reported 170 PCR-confirmed cases of Covid-19, ranging from 8 to 162 between the vaccine and placebo groups. But these figures were overshadowed by a category of illness known as ‘suspected COVID-19’ – those with symptomatic COVID-19 that had not been confirmed by PCR. According to the FDA’s report on the Pfizer vaccine, there were ‘a total of 3,410 cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 in the vaccine group compared with 1,816 in the placebo group.’"

    «With 20 times as many suspected cases as confirmed cases, this category of illness cannot be ignored simply because there were no positive PCR test results.»

    «Even after excluding cases that occurred within 7 days of vaccination (409 in the Pfizer vaccine group versus 287 in the placebo group) – which should include the majority of symptoms caused by short-term vaccine reactogenicity – the vaccine’s efficacy remains low: 29%»

    What can be said about the data-sharing statement from Moderna, which states that the data «may be available on request once the trial has finished». This means sometime between mid- and late 2022, as a two-year follow-up is planned! Things will be no different for the the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, which has promised patient-level data «when the trial is over». And the’ClinicalTrials.gov entry regarding the Russian Sputnik V vaccine states that there are no plans to share participants’ personal data.

    Many other points could be raised, including the separate treatment of HIV patients. Why is this? If it is down to immunosuppression, I would venture to say that there are many other such cases amongst 40,000 people. Moreover, it is surprising that there have been no deaths amongst all these people exposed to the virus… ↑

70. See the article by AIMSIB which debunks this farce. This study therefore shows absolutely no benefit in preventing death from Covid-19, let alone any effect on overall mortality, from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. On the contrary, the risk of hospitalisation due to serious side effects has more than doubled.Given these circumstances and in light of this study published just over a month ago, how can they still claim that these vaccines prevent death from the disease, that they are safe and effective, and, above all, that there are no serious side effects or deaths caused by these vaccines? Pfizer’s study says exactly the opposite. Under normal circumstances, a product like this would NEVER have been approved and/or would have been withdrawn immediately given such data at the six-month mark. The benefit of these injections is quite simply negative!In accounting terms, this is called a DEFICIT or a LOSS, the scale or accumulation of which can lead to a restructuring or liquidation… Moreover, let us not forget that these data are based on the original Wuhan strain, which is more deadly than the Delta variant. The risk-reward balance is therefore even more unfavourable today. ↑
71. A fraud A major scandal, already dubbed ‘PfizerGate’, involving the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, its subcontractor Ventavia Research Group – which is responsible for clinical trials – and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), was revealed yesterday by the British Medical Journal. ↑
72. Dr Peter Doshi, one of the few scientists fighting for the truth, told the US Senate: «Clinical trials have not proven that gene-based vaccines save lives. »The studies, carried out by the pharmaceutical company itself, have revealed inconsistencies and the concealment of data. These suggest, on the one hand, that the data was intentionally falsified in order to claim conclusive results, and, on the other hand, that in reality, the efficacy of gene-based injections never exceeded the 20–30% threshold.They should therefore never have been approved for marketing.Pfizer vaccine: a rigged study and dubious conclusions (article by Jean-Dominique Michel) : click here.Does the FDA believe that these data justify the first full approval of a Covid-19 vaccine? (article in English by P. Doshi in the BMJ) : click here.Pfizer versus Pfizer: the latest study is fraudulent, article on Covidhub : click here. ↑
73. Article AIMSIB. ↑
74. See here. ↑
75. Bizarre, but not funny – take, for example, the death from a cardiac arrest just after his injection, featuring the great Indian actor Vivekh, who has been enlisted to promote vaccination. It must also be admitted that wearing a mask whilst alone in his car has revealed a new gold standard of stupidity, as one might say Audiard. ↑
76. Totalitarian propaganda ought to try to reinvent itself from time to time. A comparison is not necessarily valid, but the similarities are striking. Well, obviously we can’t imagine our county medical officer taking on Caesar’s army all by himself, and I’m not sure I can see the sparkle of superhuman intelligence in his eyes. But he strikes the same pose as the others when declaring to us — in direct opposition to supposed science — his belief The idea of a highly effective vaccine backed by falsified statistics is both comical and heartbreaking.
    

    ↑

77. It is interesting to note how the concepts behind health propaganda have evolved:I get vaccinated to save my own life (health marketing), then I get vaccinated so I can travel (freedom marketing), then I get vaccinated so as not to kill my grandparents or I get vaccinated out of solidarity (guilt-tripping marketing), and now we have threats and intimidation. If you don’t get vaccinated, we’ll make your life a living hell. We’ll also make the vaccinated believe that it’s all the fault of the unvaccinated (see Veran). Every effort is being made to divide the people into two camps, even though the whole situation is entirely down to our leaders. ↑
78. See on RTL the radio hoax that sent America into a panic. ↑
79. Be sure to read the full article in English at Counterpunch which, as early as 2017, raises the question: why does this ridiculous official propaganda still work? ↑
80. See Bruno Bettleheim’s book, The Conscious Heart, in which a German psychologist describes how she had sided with the Nazis during the Second World War. The obligation to salute the Nazi flag every morning without believing in it had quickly become too humiliating for her, so she eventually let go of her reservations and began saluting it with the greatest enthusiasm. Thus, to escape the shame of stooping to salute ideas she despised, she had become a loyal Nazi. ↑
81. Ever since the plague of Marseille in 1720, it has been well established that confining healthy people is entirely counterproductive. Furthermore, it was only by confining those who were ill that smallpox was eradicated – not through vaccination, as many «specialists» still like to claim. ↑
82. Jingyi Xiao et al. (2020) « Non-pharmaceutical measures in the event of an influenza pandemic in settings other than healthcare settings – Personal and environmental protection measures »: «Although mechanistic studies confirm the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, the results of 14 randomised controlled trials of these measures did not provide evidence of a substantial effect on the transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Similarly, we found limited evidence of the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning.». ↑
83. Denis G. Rancourt (2020): « Masks don’t work: a review of the science underlying social policy on COVID-19 ». ↑
84. Wittoria Offeddu et al. (2017) « The effectiveness of masks and respirators against respiratory infections among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis «: «The evidence for a protective effect of masks or respirators against a confirmed respiratory infection (CRI) was not statistically significant».”. ↑
85. Faisal Bin-Reza et al. (2011) « The use of masks and respirators to prevent the transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence – Influenza and other respiratory viruses »: «A systematic review was undertaken to help inform the UK’s pandemic influenza guidelines. The initial review was carried out in November 2009 and updated in June 2010 and January 2011. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental and observational studies in humans, published in English, with a diagnosis of laboratory-confirmed or clinically diagnosed influenza, as well as other studies on viral respiratory infections. There were 17 eligible studies. Six of the eight randomised controlled trials found no significant difference between the control and intervention groups (masks with or without hand hygiene; N95/P2 respirators) (…) None of the studies established a conclusive link between the use of a mask or respirator and protection against influenza infection (…)». ↑
86. B. J. Cowling et al. (2010) « Face masks to prevent the transmission of the flu virus: a systematic review »: «None of the studies reviewed demonstrated any benefit from wearing a mask, whether in healthcare settings or amongst members of the general public (H). See summary tables 1 and 2.». ↑
87. Joshua L. Jacobs et al. (2009) « The use of surgical masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Japan: A randomised controlled trial »: «Healthcare workers wearing N95 masks were significantly more likely to experience headaches. There is no evidence that the use of face masks by healthcare workers offers any benefits in terms of cold symptoms or catching a cold.» ↑
88. Hand sanitisers contain endocrine disruptors. See here. ↑
89. See the MIT but also numerous articles in Children’s Health Defence. ↑
90. See Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening among nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China. ↑
91. See The Messiah and his prophet, vol. II, p. 70, by E. M. Gallez. «For women, the consequences are, in any case, disastrous; in many places where Sharia law {sari^ta^h) or Islamic law Once this rule is enforced, it becomes dangerous to have been raped, or to be pregnant out of wedlock, or even simply to be unmarried. ↑
92. See, in particular – Aurélie Haroche. When politicians confuse mathematical modelling with astrology. JIM (Journal International de Médecine). 25 April 2020. – Jean-François Toussaint, Andy Marc. Moving beyond a blind lockdown. La Recherche. 22 April 2020. – Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghan. Modelling the models. CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). 3 April 2020. ↑
93. Read the full article at English. ↑
94. Gates has been patiently infiltrating the global press for years. « But it creates a blatant conflict of interest, in that the very institutions we rely on to hold one of the richest and most powerful men in the history of the planet to account are quietly funded by him. This conflict of interest is one that the mainstream media have largely sought to ignore, whilst the supposedly altruistic philanthropist Gates continues to grow richer, laughing heartily. »See the non-exhaustive list of media outlets funded by Gates” here, as well as a very interesting discussion on philathro-capitalism. ↑
95. Vaccine recipients are taking part in a massive medical experiment without their consent. We are therefore in complete breach of the law. Isn’t it fascinating that, in perfect unison, the entire political class and all the media outlets are trampling underfoot the Oviedo Convention – which Switzerland ratified in 2008 and France in 2012 – all in order to extol a product that has not even yet received marketing authorisation? Why were Nazis hanged at Nuremberg only for us to end up in this situation? The situation has worsened still further since I began writing these lines, for we are no longer dealing with uninformed consent but with compulsory vaccination, which will remove any mitigating circumstances when these bureaucrats appear before the International Military Tribunal. ↑
96. Only Bruno Riondel has produced a striking and incisive analysis of the situation in his intervention «From 17 October to the Great Reset». ↑
97. To give you an idea of the surveillance that’s already in place, take a look at the data your iPhone collects about you without your knowledge: ↑
98. Unless we exclude Sweden, and a few other countries such as Tanzania —whose president, John Magufuli, refused to acknowledge the pandemic and asked the media not to report on the infection, but who died in strange circumstances, having previously, in May 2020, exposed the fraud behind positive PCR tests in a manner that was as amusing as it was conclusive, using Durian samples and other fruits or animals (goats and quail)! ↑
99. https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf. See also in IL FOGLIO 4 May 2020, regarding Ioannidis: «Ioannidis is well known for having written what is perhaps the most widely read scientific article in the history of biomedicine, entitled Why most research findings are wrong. The argument was that most studies carried out in the biomedical field are not reproducible. This is not only, or not so much, because many experiments are poorly designed – Ionannidis acknowledges this and condemns the negligence and the pressure to publish data – but because the causal variability inherent in the phenomena under study renders certain results false. This is a somewhat sophisticated concept for a scientific community seeking to apply mechanistic models to Darwinian phenomena. ‘Ah! How elegantly these things are put’ (The Misanthrope, I, 2, 314). ↑
100. Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of the prestigious journal *The Lancet*, states: “The accusations levelled at science are simple: a large proportion of the scientific literature – perhaps half – is quite simply false … science has taken a turn for the worse.” Dr Marcia Angell drives the point home: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the published clinical research … I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I have reached slowly and reluctantly over the course of my two decades as editor-in-chief of the *New England Journal of Medicine*.”What, then, of a ‘scientific truth’ reduced to mere statistics in a field as complex as ‘medicine’? ↑
101. This remarkable article by the team Kennedy gives us a clear picture of the ‘crab trap’ in action. More than 50 million Americans lost their jobs in the autumn of 20, whilst the wealth of billionaires increased by one thousand billion dollars – an average of 40 billion a week. ↑
102. See his intervention before the Supreme Rabbinical Council of Israel, as well as its recent interview of this admirable man who is accountable to no one but God. He has probably treated more Covid cases single-handedly than anyone else and is denouncing the onset of a global genocide. ↑
103. See the interview by Dr Bhakdi. ↑
104. Dr Michael Yeadon, a former vice-president of Pfizer, where he served as chief scientist for allergies and respiratory diseases, spent 32 years in the industry leading research into new medicines and has retired from the pharmaceutical giant with «the highest-ranking research position» in its field. He denounces government propaganda regarding COVID-19, including the «lie» about dangerous variants, the totalitarian nature of «vaccine passports» and the strong possibility that we are dealing with a «conspiracy» that could lead to something far worse than the wars and massacres of the 20th^e century. ↑
105. On 28 June, the CSAPE (Collectif des Syndicats et Associations Professionnels Européens) lodged a criminal complaint with the ICC, requesting the opening of an investigation into crimes against humanity, attacks on human dignity, enslavement and genocide, under reference number OTP-CR-271/21, targeting President Emmanuel Macron, the government and senior officials involved in the criminal mismanagement of the Covid pandemic. ↑
106. The complaint lodged in early March 2021 with the General Court has been accepted. The organisation People of Truth has lodged a complaint against the Israeli government, which is conducting illegal experiments on Israeli citizens through the Pfizer vaccination programme. Lawyer Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News : «The trial being conducted by Pfizer in the State of Israel was carried out in breach of the Nuremberg Code, which forms part of international criminal law and falls under the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in The Hague. We are now awaiting a decision.» Link to the European Council’s comments. ↑
107. See here Nicole Delépine’s article, «The day will come when those who deny the value of early treatment will be held to account. In India, a WHO representative is facing accusations.» ↑
108. Alexis de Tocqueville (1835), Democracy in America I (Part Two), Chapter X. ↑
109. The web of connections is probably even more complex than the feudal ties of the Middle Ages; I have sought to simplify matters here by mentioning only the most prominent names. The family Wallenberg for example, holds shares in AstraZeneca through its highly influential investment company Investor AB. But there are also miracles … one need only look at the extraordinary life of one of the family members, Raoul Wallemberg, who saved the lives of several thousand Jews during the war.As for the link between agriculture and Big Pharma, one need only look back to Elf-Aquitaine (which was later taken over by the Total group) and the creation of Sanofi … the link is direct. It is just as direct with the world of luxury: the Bettencourt family (with André Bettencourt as a hooded leader and collaborator) and the Arnault family (with, here too, the father and the son-in-law, Xavier Niel, who has recently become involved in agriculture).Here we are very close to the arms manufacturers Lagardère and Dassault. We are therefore reminded of the Elf affair and that extremely shady character who prowled the corridors of power from the 1930s onwards: Etienne Léandri … an associate, an agent of the Sicilian Mafia in France – and therefore linked to the CIA – Charles Pasqua’s ‘protective godfather’ and a leading strategist for ‘France Afrique’ … When you follow Léandri’s trail, you soon end up back at Georges Alberini, himself a collaborator and a patron of French industry. A behind-the-scenes adviser to Georges Pompidou … to whom Jacques Chirac would become close.Pompidou, a Rothschild agent (whose members included Vincent Bolloré – who would go on to buy the Worms Bank, Albertini’s post-war patron – through his grandmother), organised the financial reform that gave rise to the national debt.This financial reform will no doubt involve Michel Cicurel (brother of Ilana Cicurel, cousin of Tristan Mendès-France, who were so critical of the film *Hold Up* upon its release) and a certain Jean-René Bernard, a convicted banker, whose daughter is the Chairwoman – appointed by Emmanuel Macron – of the CNIL, and the son-in-law – the highly controversial chairman of France’s seventh-largest bank (which owns the Leetchi fundraising platform) – who was very recently forced to resign under pressure, but replaced by a certain Julien Carmona, a school friend of Edouard Philippe. Julien Carmona, whose father was none other than one of the last confidants of … Etienne Léandri … One of whose close associates was Achille Peretti, the father-in-law of … Nicolas Sarkozy, of course, whose name quickly cropped up in the ‘Air Cocaïne’ drugs scandal ’ … but that is another story, even though drug trafficking is inextricably linked to Big Pharma and the discoveries made by German researchers at Bayer. Morphine was distributed on a massive scale during the First World War, at a time when the effectiveness of chemical nitrates on grass growth was observed, making the grass taller and greener on the battlefields of Verdun… ↑
110. In this respect, Macron and Trudeau are classic examples of psychopathy, with their handsome faces. They are so depraved that even putting them to work in the garden would not be without risk… Just look the analysis Macron’s remarkable achievement, as described by a leading Italian professor of psychiatry. ↑
111. The divorce The relationship between Melinda and Bill is based not only on his unbridled infidelity but probably also on the relationship Bill’s connection with the sinister Epstein, who «committed suicide» in his cell. In the 1997 biography Overdrive: Bill Gates and the race to control cyberspace, the biographer James Wallace stated that Bill Gates“ extravagant lifestyle was common knowledge, but that the mainstream press had decided not to mention it. The Gates ”myth« was untouchable. The Microsoft founder, it is claimed, used to pay dancers to swim naked with his guests in his indoor swimming pool. This was nothing new to those who really knew him: at Harvard, the tycoon was »used to hanging out in Boston’s Combat Zone, with its porn shows, prostitutes and strip clubs”. A rock-star lifestyle that he subsequently maintained, Wallace points out, even in the early years with Melinda. In 2013, Epstein and Gates visited Strasbourg to gain a comprehensive overview of the healthcare system in Europe. At that time, Gates was merely the CEO of Microsoft. He took the opportunity to travel to Norway in an attempt to bribe the Nobel Prize jury to secure the Nobel Peace Prize for himself. Epstein was his pass because he had ensnared many members of the royal family — for example, he supplied Prince Andrew with women. ↑
112. See La Currency War A classic that has become the bedside reading of members of the Communist Party’s Central Committee and Chinese bankers. Hongbing Song’s Chinese bestseller recounts the history of the great monetary cabal that has shaped the world for over two hundred years, from the founding of the Rothschild dynasty at the end of the 18th^th from the turn of the century until the 2008 crisis. ↑
113. The first person to be duped by the Rothschild financiers was the King of England. Nathan In this respect, he was also a pioneer in the use of panic and false news: having learnt of the French defeat at Waterloo 24 hours before anyone else, he took up position on the Stock Exchange, leaning against «his favourite pillar», and began to sell. Everyone assumed that Rothschild «knew something», and everyone began to liquidate their positions. By the end of the day, Nathan had bought up the entire stock exchange for 5% of its value. Bonaparte, having only just been elected First Consul, established the The so-called Bank of France, a private institution, much like, for example, the US Federal Reserve. It was these Swiss bankers – who were also under the influence of the Rothschilds – who would make and break the First Empire as soon as the Emperor no longer served their interests sufficiently. ↑
114. The essential book is The Secret History of the Anglo-American Oligarchy, by Quigley. Drawing on a wealth of archival material, the author sets out and explains how, in the second half of the nineteenth century, the Anglo-Saxon elites devised a veritable battle plan to enable the British Empire, in alliance with the United States, to establish complete hegemony over the world. This drive for power and domination was the work of a handful of men closely linked to the world of high finance in the City and on Wall Street. A whole group, drawn from the British high aristocracy and bourgeoisie and linked to an American elite, emerged. Through painstaking research, Carroll Quigley identified the names and laid bare the ambitions of this «super-class« or «technocratic family» – a term used ahead of its time to describe a group bound by close social and family ties.If you have never heard of the Milner Group (which would later evolve into other organisations such as the Bilderberg Group), and if the names Sazonov or Izvolsky mean nothing to you, then you should also read Docherty and McGregor, who—following on from Quigley—revealed the secret motivations behind the First World War in The Secret Origins of the First World War. Their work is largely corroborated by McMeekin in his famous The Russian Origins of the First World War. ↑
115. I would refer the reader to Bruno Riondel’s key works on communism. His classic The Shocking Truth highlights the horrors of the system’s implementation and social engineering, and demonstrates that communism is not dead and that it has deep links with capitalism. An excellent talk, which has been censored by YouTube, can be found here. ↑
116. Conclusions from the European Council on COVID-19, energy, trade and external relations, 21 October 2021: “further increasing vaccination rates”, “overcoming mistrust by combating disinformation on social media”, “coordination to facilitate free movement” (which, in diplomatic parlance, means a health pass) “legislative measures relating to the Health Union” “access to medicines in all Member States” “access to vaccines for all” “a strong and central role for the WHO in future global health governance” “an international treaty on pandemics”

     In his excellent article in the Strategists’ Newsletter, Éric Verhaeghe concludes: «This list demonstrates just how closely European governments are aligned around a common “mainstream” approach to the pandemic, with talking points that recur constantly at every level of the multilateral hierarchy.”.

     One thing to note about the European Council is that it also aims to prepare for the G20 meeting, where the pandemic will be discussed. Here we are wading in the very depths of multilateralism. We learn that European leaders are talking about preparing for “future global health governance” with the WHO. We hadn’t heard anything clear about this project amongst ourselves, and we’re only just finding out about it without it having been discussed by anyone. Ultimately, it is by reading the conclusions of the European Councils that we come to understand what is being plotted behind the scenes in the inner workings of the multilateral world. The overriding idea is to transform the World Health Organisation into a global governance structure for pandemics. It would therefore be the WHO that would decide everything: vaccines, treatments and emergency measures.

     Such a transfer of sovereignty is, of course, neither explained to the peoples of the Union nor discussed with them. The decision has been taken and all that remains is to implement it. The pandemic will therefore also have served to strip the people of their rights and to pave the way for the emergence of an all-powerful multilateral caste. » ↑

117. See The Theory and Practice of Oligarchic Collectivism by J.B.E. Goldstein. Whatever the scandalous origins of the work, supposedly dated 1948, or its links to the famous *1984* by Orwell (whose real name was Eric Arthur Blair), the text sheds light on globalist thinking and its driving forces: the role of secrecy, the inner circles of the Republic and secret societies; and that hidden aristocracy which beheaded the king to recreate its own obscure and debased aristocracy, and which fights against Catholicism to recreate its own syncretic and anti-Catholic religion. One can find on a website dedicated to Karl Polanyi in the spotlight — the author of the Great Transformation— one article An interesting piece on the so-called Goldstein. ↑
118. We shall return later to the sinister figure of Jacques Attali, who has long been the high priest of the globalists and who is also the man responsible for creating and promoting Macron. Let us quote here from his article in 2009 «Moving forward out of fear»: A major pandemic would bring home the need for altruism, or at least self-interested altruism. Let us, whilst we’re at it, marvel at the sublime oxymoron of ‘self-serving altruism’, and at Jerusalem as the future capital of the new world order. ↑
119. I am referring here to Claire Séverac’s book: The secret war against the people, a thoroughly researched essay on facts that have been deliberately overlooked or even dismissed by our media, all of which are in the grip of this all-powerful caste. The reader will find nothing but proven facts, which are difficult to dispute and have been painstakingly compiled by Claire Séverac, who undoubtedly paid for her honesty and integrity with her life. This book is a comprehensive work and indeed a reference work on this sensitive subject. And the latest developments in this mad and deadly race towards this «new world order« – as they call it, so as not to say «global dictatorship« – only serve to confirm her claims. It is a full-blown indictment. It covers everything from the «HAARP« programme – which involves bombarding the ionosphere with very high-frequency waves to artificially trigger storms, earthquakes and even tsunamis – to GMOs, via nanotechnologies, bioengineering, transhumanism, not to mention all the scams such as the climate or health pretexts, including Bill Gates’ vaccination campaigns in the Third World, which are causing infertility in women or far more serious illnesses. ↑
120. See the article in the Strategists’ Newsletter. One thing is certain: the Covid-19 outbreak began in Wuhan well before December 2019. American satellite images showed twice as many cars as usual in the car parks of Wuhan’s main hospitals as early as August 2019.Second certainty: the Chinese government, acting in a manner typical of a communist regime, concealed the existence of the epidemic for as long as possible and only spoke about it publicly under duress, in January 2020, when it was no longer possible to keep it hidden.Third certainty: Dr Anthony Fauci did everything in his power to prevent Donald Trump from investigating the possibility of a laboratory accident at the P4 facility in Wuhan because he had, directly or indirectly, authorised funding for the Wuhan laboratory.  There have been a growing number of revelations on this subject in recent weeks. In short, so-called “gain-of-function” research – which involves modifying a virus’s genome to make it more dangerous to humans – was banned in the United States between 2013 and 2017. American researchers were nevertheless able to continue carrying out such research at the Wuhan laboratory, using, amongst other resources, Pentagon funding channelled through an NGO called EcoHealth Alliance. On 20 July 2021, Anthony Fauci had once again denied the existence of this type of research but a network of researchers called DRASTIC (Decentralised Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19) continues to provide evidence to the contrary.Fourth certainty: the theory that the virus was transmitted naturally to humans is gaining fewer and fewer supporters. The theory that it was a laboratory accident is gaining widespread acceptance, particularly as everyone agrees that the Chinese were conducting research in Wuhan at security level 2 that required security level 4.Fifth certainty: the Chinese military would certainly have preferred to avoid the publicity surrounding the Wuhan laboratory since she was conducting research there, in conjunction with civilian research, into the biological weapons of the future. ↑
121. The highly reasoned and persuasive article by journalist Nicholas Wade marked a turning point in the realisation that the virus had been manipulated. Although the author has spent more than four decades as a leading science correspondent at the The New York Times and in other major media outlets, his work was published quietly on 2 May on the blog site Medium, without any support or prestigious endorsement, and then republished on 5 May via the low-traffic website of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. You can also read The origins of Covid: an Orwellian about-turn and a damp squib. ↑
122. Virologists claim that genetic “fingerprints” prove that COVID-19 is of human origin and has no credible natural ancestor. Brief summary: the study suggests that Chinese scientists created the virus whilst working on a gain-of-function project in a laboratory in Wuhan.Gain-of-function research, which has been temporarily banned in the United States, involves modifying natural viruses to make them more infectious in order to study their potential effects on humans.According to the article, Chinese scientists took the ‘backbone’ of a natural coronavirus found in Chinese cave bats and added a new ‘spike’ to it, transforming it into COVID-19, a deadly and highly transmissible virus.The researchers, who concluded that COVID-19 “has no credible natural ancestor”, also believe that scientists reverse-engineered versions of the virus to cover their tracks. “ “We believe that reverse-engineered viruses were created,” Dalgleish told DailyMail.com. “They modified the virus and then tried to make it appear as though it had been present in a sequence years ago.”The study also reports “deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data” in Chinese laboratories and notes that “scientists who wished to share their findings were unable to do so or have disappeared”.Until recently, most experts had firmly denied that the virus’s origins were anything other than a natural infection transmitted from animals to humans.Earlier this week, Dr Anthony Fauci defended US funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, stating that the $600,000 grant had not been approved for gain-of-function research. ↑
123. See Covid-19: the origin of the virus – Professor Tritto’s analysis confirms that of Professor Montagnier. A controversial book has just been published in Italy on the origins of the virus that has turned the world upside down over the last six months. Professor Luc Montagnier, who was heavily criticised in the media last April, sees his claim – that the virus was the result of human manipulation and had (accidentally) escaped from the Wuhan laboratory – now reiterated in this book.  We retrace the events and present extracts from an interview with the book’s author, Professor Tritto, in the Italian newspaper *Libero*.On 17 April 2020, on Cnews, Professor Luc Montagnier, winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his role in the discovery of the virus responsible for AIDS, confirmed his statement that SARS-CoV-2 is man-made. «We have come to the conclusion that this virus has been manipulated. Part of it – I’m not saying all of it. There is a model, which is the classic virus, but to which HIV sequences have been added on top.» «It is not natural; it is the work of a professional, a molecular biologist, a sequence engineer. To what end? One of my hypotheses is that they wanted to develop a vaccine against AIDS.» Professor Montagnier presented his findings on 30 July 2020 in a article published in a peer-reviewed journal, and which will never be cited in other journals — self-censorship and omerta — nor the rubbish media. In summary: «The following analogy helps to illustrate this conclusion: let us imagine a main «coronavirus» jigsaw puzzle consisting of 30,000 pieces, followed by several other puzzles of 9,000 pieces each, which we shall call HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV (a retrovirus closely related to HIV-2 that targets monkeys). The mathematical proof demonstrated can be illustrated as follows: in the 30,000-piece jigsaw puzzle, at a specific location there are three contiguous pieces (side by side), each originating from one of the other three jigsaw puzzles. The probability of this result occurring naturally is zero.» ↑
124. Wei Jingsheng, a former Chinese communist, claims that SARS-CoV-2 was deliberately injected into participants during the International Military Games held in Wuhan in October 2019. In the documentary by Sky News In a programme entitled «What Really Happened in Wuhan», the former Chinese communist claimed that the Beijing government had allegedly used the World Military Games as an opportunity to spread the virus.This event brought together 9,000 athletes from various countries around the world in October 2019, two months before the virus was officially declared to exist. Furthermore, this sporting event was held in the city of Wuhan, the initial epicentre of the outbreak.At the time, according to Mr Jingsheng, participants at the event – notably German, French and American athletes – fell ill with a mysterious disease. They displayed symptoms of Covid-19 but were never tested. See also the article by Mail Online. ↑
125. See the must-see attractions article by Eric Verhaeghe. “In this third instalment of the investigation, we will examine how the West – led by the United States and France – bears a heavy responsibility for the emergence of COVID-19. This in no way absolves Communist China of its primary and principal responsibility for the origins and spread of the pandemic. However, it was indeed Western research that enabled the researcher Shi Zhengli, from Wuhan, to become the Frankenstein of this story, from whom her monstrous creation escaped.” ↑
126. These machinations were exposed in France by Professor Fourtillan, who found himself arbitrarily imprisoned and forcibly admitted to a psychiatric hospital — the old Soviet tactics still work. See Qactus. Professor Montagnier was also one of the first to prove that the virus was man-made, before being buried under a deluge of slander from the mainstream media, with his videos deleted from all platforms, including Facebook. ↑
127. See https://denisbider.blogspot.com/2021/07/dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich.htmlThe discoveries fundamental carried out by Dr David Martin at his company, M-CAM. The interview by Robert Füllmich reveals that more than 4,000 patents have been filed relating to the coronavirus and SARS. Martin compared the patent records available in spring 2020 with the gene sequence identified as a new virus, as defined by the WHO’s International Committee on Virus Taxonomy. His team thus found more than 120 pieces of patented evidence suggesting that this is by no means a new coronavirus, but rather countless very subtle modifications to coronavirus sequences. There is therefore no new coronavirus identified as such. The first coronavirus vaccine ever to be patented was filed by Pfizer and specifically included the ‘S’ spike protein – the very same protein that is said to have been developed in a rush. The initial application was submitted on 28 January 2000.The idea that we have somehow mysteriously stumbled upon a way to develop vaccines so quickly is not only ridiculous, it is downright inconceivable. On 28 January 2000, Timothy Miller, Sharon Klepfer, Albert Paul Reed and Elaine Jones filed what was eventually published as US Patent 6372224, namely the spike protein vaccine against canine coronavirus.SARS is by no means the natural evolution of a zoonotic mutation of the coronavirus. In 1999, Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Based on a patent application filed on 19 April 2002, the NIAID engineered an infectious, replication-deficient coronavirus targeting the human pulmonary epithelium. In other words, we created SARS and patented it even before there was a so-called epidemic in Asia, which followed several months later. This US patent 7279327 clearly sets out, in a highly specific genetic sequence, that we were aware of the ACE receptor, the ACE-2 binding domain, the S1 spike protein and other components of Covid-19. It was designed and synthetically engineered in a laboratory using gene sequencing technologies, taking a computer code and transforming it into a pathogen or a pathogen precursor. Initially, this technology was funded exclusively as a means of exploiting the coronavirus as a vector for delivering the HIV vaccine.In the autumn of 2001, M-CAM began monitoring a huge number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were patented by the NIH, the NIAID, USAMRIID and other international agencies. They were concerned that the coronavirus was regarded not only as a potential manipulable agent that could be used as a vaccine vector, but also as a candidate for a biological weapon.The so-called SARS outbreak that took place in China in 2002–2003 led to a problematic patent application being filed in April 2003 by the US CDC. The CDC filed a patent application for the complete genetic sequence of what became the SARS coronavirus, which constitutes a violation of Section 101 of Title 35 of the US Code — A natural substance cannot be patented. This was patent 7220852, along with related patents, notably patents 46592703p and 7776521. These patents also covered methods for detecting the coronavirus using RT-PCR. This poses a problem because whoever holds both the patent on the gene itself and on its detection thereby has the advantage of being able to exercise 100 per cent control over the origin not only of the virus itself but also of its detection. You have total control over both the scientific aspect and public communication. This patent application by the CDC was allegedly justified by its public relations team on the grounds that it would enable everyone to carry out research into the coronavirus. This is a lie, as the Patent Office twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence on the grounds that it was unpatentable – the Patent Office found a 99.9 per cent match with the coronavirus already in the public domain. Despite the patent examiner’s rejection, and after having to pay a fine on appeal in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overruled the Patent Office’s rejection and finally obtained the patent on the SARS coronavirus in 2007.

     All the CDC’s claims that this was in the public interest are contradicted by the bribe it paid to the Patent Office. The CDC paid an additional fee to ensure that its application remained confidential. Fact-checkers have repeatedly stated that the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is distinct from the CDC’s patent. The genetic sequence filed by the CDC in 2003, 2005 and 2006 shows an identity of 89 to 99 % with the sequence covering SARS-CoV-2. The main designation for the SARS coronavirus and the SARS-CoV-2 subclade must overlap from a taxonomic perspective.

     On 28 April 2003, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, based in Maryland, filed US Patent No. 7151163 relating to antiviral agents for the treatment and control of coronavirus infections. This was three days after the CDC had filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals and, ultimately, Ablynx Pharmaceuticals, were incorporated into the share capital of Pfizer, Crucell and Johnson & Johnson. How can you get a patent on a treatment for something that was invented three days earlier? ?

     Sequoia’s patent on the treatment of coronavirus was granted and published before the CDC’s coronavirus patent was authorised. The only way Sequoia could have known the information contained in the CDC’s patent was through an internal source, as the CDC had paid to keep it secret. This is the very definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory; it is evidence. This is a RICO case.

     The RICO protocol established in April 2003 for the first coronavirus followed the same timetable for SARS-CoV-2. Moderna obtained the sequence of the spike protein by telephone from the NIAID’s vaccine research centre before the new subclass had been defined. How can one deal with something before one knows what it is?

     On 5 June 2008, at around the same time that DARPA (the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency) began actively investigating the coronavirus as a biological weapon, Ablynx, now part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents targeting what we were told were new features of SARS-CoV-2. These targeted the polybasic cleavage site of SARS-CoV, the new spike protein and the ACE-2 receptor-binding domain. These elements are purportedly new to SARS-CoV-2, and all were patented on 5 June 2008. The patents were granted between 24 November 2015 (US Patent 9,193,780; this was granted after the moratorium on gain-of-function research, following the MERS outbreak in the Middle East), followed in 2016, 2017 and 2019 by a series of patents covering not only the RNA strands but also the sub-components of the gene strands, all granted to Ablynx and Sanofi.

     Crucell, Rubius Therapeutics, Children’s Medical Corporation, and many others, including Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Protein Science Corporation, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, the University of Iowa, the University of Hong Kong, and the Chinese National Human Genome Centre in Shanghai – all identified in patent filings dating from 2008 to 2017, with each attribute allegedly disclosed exclusively in the sole reference publication «The Novel Bat Coronavirus», the article that has been systematically used to identify the new virus.

     If you actually look at what they claim to be new, you will find 73 patents granted between 2008 and 2019 that contain the elements that were supposedly new in SARS-CoV-2. More specifically, the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-2 receptor-binding domain and the spike protein.

     There was no SARS outbreak because we had modified every component of that virus. In 2016, a paper by Ralph Baric was funded during the moratorium on gain-of-function research, stating that the SARS coronavirus was ready to emerge in humans. At that time, not only was it ready to emerge in humans, but it had been patented 73 times for commercial exploitation!

     The people at Moderna knew that they were going to be at the forefront of vaccine development in March 2019. At that time, for reasons that are unclear, they amended a series of rejected patent applications to make specific reference to the deliberate or accidental release of a coronavirus. They amended four rejected patent applications to begin the process of developing a coronavirus vaccine. They then began to tackle a major problem: namely, that they were relying on technology they did not own. Two Canadian companies, Arbutus and Acuitas, actually hold the patent on the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery system required to deliver the mRNA fragment. These patents have been granted in Canada, the United States and worldwide. Moderna did not own the rights and began negotiating with Arbutus and Acuitas to secure access to the LNP technology so that it could be incorporated into a vaccine. In November, the company entered into a research and development collaboration agreement with UNC Chapel Hill to obtain the spike protein to be incorporated into the LNP, meaning it had a vaccine candidate even before a pathogen was reportedly circulating.

     Their standard procedure is similar to that of other pharmaceutical companies, where applications are constantly renewed and amended to take advantage of the earliest available priority dates. From 2016 to 2019, at each meeting of the NIAID Advisory Board, Anthony Fauci lamented his failure to find a way to gain acceptance for the universal flu vaccine, which was his favourite means of getting the public on board with this process…

     In March 2019, in Moderna’s amended patent applications, an illuminating thought emerged: ‘What if there were an accidental or deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen?’ The sentence is quoted verbatim in the book *A World at Risk*, which sets out the scenario devised by the WHO in September 2019 – months before any suspected pathogen emerged – and states: ‘We need a coordinated global exercise involving the release of a respiratory pathogen, which, by September 2020, must establish a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control and acceptance of a universal vaccination mandate.’ The language referring to the deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen was included in the scenario that “must be completed by September 2020” in the joint statement by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. A number of people claimed credit for it, only to backtrack later.

     Any claim that this pathogen is in any way unique or new is completely undermined by the actual genetic sequences published in the patent application. Even more seriously, Peter Daszak himself states that we need to create a media hype so that the public will accept the medical countermeasure that a pan-coronavirus vaccine represents. What is most ridiculous is that the WHO declared that the coronavirus was no longer a concern – that we had eradicated the coronavirus as a public health threat. So why, having eradicated it in 2007 and 2008, did we start spending billions of dollars worldwide on a vaccine for a disease that had been declared eradicated in 2008?

     This biological weapon was considered highly adaptable. In 2005, it was undoubtedly a weapon of choice. The illusion in which we continue to see well-meaning people falling into a trap is to debate the question of whether we have a vaccine against a virus. This is not the case. We are injecting a spike protein mRNA sequence that is the result of a computer simulation – not derived from nature – of a sequence that has been known and patented for years.

     The absurdity of the claim that this is a prophylactic or preventive treatment runs counter to all the evidence. The evidence clearly shows that no pharmaceutical company has made any effort to combat the virus. The aim is to inject people with the S1 spike protein, which is known to be harmful. ↑

128. A quick word here on the concept of predictive programming which involves promoting the ideas of globalist development in everyday life. This involves using television programmes, films, comic books, magazines, the internet of course, songs, presenters, leading figures such as Attali, and so on, to plant the idea of a specific subject in the minds of the masses. Then, years later, the subject becomes a reality. It is a form of brainwashing, so that when the time is right, there is no difficulty whatsoever in accepting the idea as normal. Bertrand Russell, H.G. Wells and the Huxley family are perfect examples — I shall omit here everything concerning the Black Lives Matter or even the Antifas — see The Quad, S02. The various simulations produced by the major foundations serve the same purpose. The «Rockefeller’ Foundation » This serves as a warning that the population will remain under strict control even after the epidemic has ended: “Even after the pandemic had subsided, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities persisted and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world tightened their grip on power (p.19)”The The Protocols of the Elders of Zion : whoever the author may be, the Protocols merely envisage the covert seizure of power by a particular caste, whilst drawing on ideas that were in vogue at the end of the 19th century. After all, might democracy not be a mask and a transitional means of establishing a form of despotism of Eastern origin? This, at any rate, was what the Marquis de Custine foresaw in his *Letters from Russia* as early as the first half of the 19th^th century. The relevance of this text, written at least a hundred years ago, is astonishing: everything that is happening to us today seems to be described in it. I leave it to the reader to explore this line of inquiry, which is beyond my expertise. In The Time Machine (1895) H. G. Wells describes a future world in which the planet’s inhabitants are divided into two groups, the Morlocks living underground and the Eloïs enjoying the paradise that the Earth has become. In Brave New World (1932) Aldous Huxley gifted the world with a visionary work of fiction that comes close to reality. The spirit of the book has inspired entire generations of novelists and philosophers. Sex, drugs, security, leisure, manipulation: Aldous Huxley had it all figured out. In 2007, Serge Carfantan wrote a summary of Aldous’s thinking — entitled «Lesson 163: Wisdom and Rebellion»: « To nip any revolt in the bud, one must not resort to violence. […]We must ensure that access to knowledge becomes increasingly difficult and exclusive.Let the gulf between the people and science widen; let the information intended for the general public be watered down.Above all, no philosophy. Here, too, we must rely on persuasion rather than direct force: we will broadcast information and entertainment on a massive scale via television, always appealing to people’s emotions or instincts.

     We shall keep people’s minds occupied with trivial and light-hearted matters.

     Amidst incessant chatter and music, it is good to stop the mind from thinking.

     We will place sexuality at the forefront of human concerns.

     As a social tranquilliser, there’s nothing better.

     Generally speaking, we shall endeavour to banish the seriousness of existence, to mock everything of high value, and to constantly champion frivolity: so that the euphoria of advertising becomes the benchmark for human happiness and the model of freedom. »

     Films: Songbird which covers just about everything from the pandemic to the mandatory wearing of face masks and the health pass; The Army of the 12 Monkeys involving the deliberate release of a deadly virus; The Crossing, it tells the story of a pandemic virus that was released into the world two years in the future and has since spread to the present day. Of course, it also mentions toxic vaccines and lockdowns. This series was released in 2018, well before this pandemic. ↑

129. See here, the article in *L’Obs* praises Gates for having predicted the pandemic, even though it had been planned since the early 2000s. ↑
130. From October 2019, the simulation Event 201 held at Johns Hopkins University in the presence of the globalist elite, examined the impact of a coronavirus pandemic. When you have everything, there is no longer even any need to hide whilst plotting. Gates subsequently had the audacity to claim that he had not been present at the meeting. A reading of the recommendations It’s not without irony, given the level of corruption and the close ties between all the bodies mentioned. « Industry, national governments and international organisations should work together » and « Governments and the private sector should give greater priority to developing methods to combat misinformation and disinformation” to name but these two. ↑
131. See the feature It’s mind-boggling when you look at this wretch, who has tripled his fortune since becoming a «philanthropist». Good old Gates announced Six years ago, a global pandemic broke out caused by a virus similar to the flu. ↑
132. You can listen to it here in a more «subdued» version than the original video, in which he speaks in a very excited manner, accompanied by exaggerated, ape-like gestures. ↑
133. Speech by Bill Gates, «Innovating Towards Zero» at the annual TED2010 conference in Long Beach, California, on 18 February 2010. Around the 4-minute mark, Gates says: «Let’s look at population first. The world’s population is currently 6.8 billion. It is heading towards around 9 billion.”. However, whilst we are doing an excellent job on new vaccines, healthcare and reproductive health services, we are reducing this by 10 or 15 per cent. » ↑
134. Today, we can see that the health crisis is bringing together, in almost perfect harmony, the political establishment, the media, the civil service, political parties, trade unions, educational institutions, cultural institutions and religious organisations… all of whom are following the authorities as one, without a critical eye. But the most important thing is the tremendous manipulation of people’s minds to which we are being subjected. The social engineers of communism exploited crises and disasters, deliberately exaggerating them to keep people in a state of constant anxiety and secure greater submission. The exploitation of shortages, the constant suspicion of conspiracies that was denounced, and the dramatisation of the epidemic… were common practices used to keep the masses in a state of fear, rendering them totally dependent on the benevolent state. ↑
135. See the interview by Marion Maréchal Le Pen: «Every European will be assigned a digital identity containing all our social, tax, banking and health information, so that we can be better controlled» ↑
136. Let us quote here from the essay by Sir Julian Huxley, who coined the term «transhumanism’ and founded UNESCO: “ It is the quality of people, not merely their quantity, that we must aim for: consequently, a coordinated policy is needed to prevent the growing influx of people from overwhelming all our hopes for a better world ». ↑
137. The term «transhumanism» dates back to the 1950s, but it only became widely known in the 1990s, when researchers began to recognise the potential of NBIC convergence: nanotechnology (N), biology (B), information technology (I) and cognitive sciences (artificial intelligence and brain sciences – C) were advancing and converging at an explosive rate. The desire for immortality lies at the heart of this new religion, which follows on from scientism and positivism. Only the industrial, allopathic view of a human being as a collection of organs can underpin this new delusion, which is already facilitating all manner of foetal trafficking through networks of NGOs.The inventor and propagandist of transhumanism is Sir Julian Huxley (1887–1975), a leading biologist, the first director-general of UNESCO and co-founder of the WWF. As the word «eugenics» had become highly controversial following the Nazi atrocities, Julian Huxley therefore coined, in 1957, a neologism synonymous with left-wing eugenics: «transhumanism». His brother Aldous Huxley (1894–1963) wrote *Brave New World* in 1931, describing the ideal eugenicist society. This is one of many examples of predictive programming which sets out the direction the world should take under the globalist agenda. ↑
138. Let us consider that Prince Philip asked to re-emerge as a particularly deadly virus. Overpopulation is one of the recurring themes among globalists. ↑
139. We have included opposite an illustration of the front cover of *The Economist* of 21 May announcing the future digital currency that will be foisted upon us following the economic collapse — it is likely that, as early as the start of the new academic year, bankrupt pension funds will prompt those in power to announce the next stage of the programme. What is tiresome about globalists is their «traditional» side, as Pierre Hillard so aptly puts it (see an excellent lecture here). They always use the same symbols: on the left, the temple; on the right, the eye emerging from the clouds at the top of the pyramid (just like on the one-dollar note); and the letter G, which stands for the companions of the second degree of Freemasonry. As nothing is left to chance with these people, one should also note the rectangular dot placed in the centre of the letter G. This could be a thinly veiled reference to population control via implants; indeed, in a sagittal section, the midbrain resembles the letter G. To conclude, we no longer even place our trust in God, but in technology.We shall remember that millionaires want to make money, whilst billionaires want to make history. But multi-billionaires go even further in their delusions of being demi-gods: they want humanity to adapt to their needs and desires. As for those who control billions upon billions, well, they care as much about our wishes as we do about ants when sweeping the garden. ↑
140. As an ideology, technocracy extols knowledge and expertise as the primary sources of legitimate power and authority, and asserts that there is «a better way of doing things» which only «experts» (for example, engineers, scientists and doctors) can determine. ↑
141. See Microsoft’s infamous patent 060606 — a troubling reference to the Book of Revelation — which aims to create a digitally embedded currency, no doubt tested in Rwanda. An interesting article here. ↑
142. See, in this regard, the prophetic speech by Solzhenitsyn at Harvard on the loss of courage in the West and the folly of tearing down the pillars of our societies. Historically, the murder of Louis XVI marked the first attack on the image of the father, who symbolically embodies the law. This trend has continued right up to the present day, where all masculine qualities are systematically denied in favour, for example, of delusional notions such as gender theory. ↑
143. As the recalls Eric Verhaeghe argues that immigration and civil liberties are one and the same issue: «They are two sides of the same project to dilute the West within a vast, globalised whole – one that is subservient and moulded to the needs of a new form of crony capitalism.» «The American-Hungarian speculator Soros, a pupil of Karl Popper, has set up a foundation that claims to overthrow, or assist in the overthrow of, “traditional” societies – that is to say, the good old Western nation-states. To erode their identity, Soros has not hesitated to provide generous funding to the NGOs organising the migration crisis. His aim is clear and unambiguous: it is to erode the old national resistance movements in Europe and to promote “inclusive activism” through which our societies would no longer make any distinction between individuals, whether on cultural, ethnic or gender grounds. In this vision of an open society, compulsory vaccination, health passes, social credit and the fear of disease all play essential roles. »As a young Jewish boy «adopted» by an SS officer, thereby escaping the widespread massacre, it is undeniable that, given such a background, Soros did not emerge from it psychologically unscathed…” ↑
144. Our friend, Dr Astrid Stuckelberger, has provided an overview of corruption within the WHO in the article here. She rightly highlights GAVI’s exceptional status, comparable to that of the BRI (Bank for International Resources, which the City of New York used to channel numerous patents to Nazi Germany until the end of 1944). These two institutions operate as a state within a state: untouchable and unassailable. ↑
145. Gates has even encroached upon one of the last bastions of scientific resistance within mainstream medicine by taking control of Cochrane. ↑
146. The Director-General of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus. The WHO — which has distinguished itself by its appalling handling of the pandemic, had its aim truly been the welfare of patients — is not an international organisation working for the good of humanity, but rather a body hijacked by a few interest groups, dominated by Bill Gates. Nobody talks about it, but the systemic corruption within the WHO is such that 200 million dollars is spent each year on travel expenses, which is more than the funds allocated to the fight against AIDS. Tedros is a prime example of these «ordinary» men, as most of the Nazis tried at Nuremberg were described. Elected in 2017 to lead this now mafia-like organisation, he was a member of the board of directors of the Global Fund from 2009 to 2011, and chairman of the board of the GAVI Vaccine Alliance in 2008–2009 before being elected to the WHO’s leadership. A sign that these scoundrels have no limits whatsoever: upon his arrival at the WHO, he appointed… Robert Mugabe as a goodwill ambassador! The Guardian explains to us in 2015 that: From January 1983 onwards, a campaign of terror was waged against the Ndebele people in Matabeleland, in western Zimbabwe. The so-called Gukurahundi massacres represent one of the darkest periods in the country’s post-independence history, when more than 20,000 civilians were killed by Robert Mugabe’s notorious Fifth Brigade. Good old Tedros, accused of crime against humanity, is the first non-doctor to head the WHO. Tedros is a member of the «Tigray People’s Liberation Front» (TPLF), a terrorist organisation founded as a revolutionary communist party; this no doubt explains his effusive admiration for the ruling Chinese Communist Party. His track record includes: the persecution of dissidents, the cover-up of a cholera epidemic, organised famine, the torture of political prisoners, the sale of Ethiopian land to international firms at rock-bottom prices, and the brutal suppression of protests (500 dead), to name but a few. Praised to the skies by the complicit media, this gallows bird owes his election to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which skilfully navigated the organisation’s labyrinthine nomination process. ↑
147. To round off this overview of that scoundrel Tedros, I recommend that readers visit the blog of the invaluable Liliane Held-Khawam. ↑
148. Last year, Russia was the only country to enshrine in its constitution the principle that national laws take precedence over international laws. This is a real snub to global supranational institutions. It seems that freedom now lies on the other side of the former «Wall». ↑
149. It is difficult to visualise how all these bodies are intertwined. There are close links between organisations and companies such as the The Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, the pharmaceutical lobby and the World Bank, not to mention secondary service providers. ↑
150. Virtually all of Big Pharma can be traced back to two companies: Vanguard and BlackRock. Vanguard and BlackRock are the two main owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney and News Corp – four of the six media companies that control more than 90 % of the US media landscape.BlackRock and Vanguard form a secret monopoly that owns just about everything you can think of. In total, they hold stakes in 1,600 US companies, whose combined revenues amounted to 9.1 trillion dollars in 2015. If we add the world’s third-largest owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90 per cent of all companies in the S&P 500. Vanguard is BlackRock’s largest shareholder. Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a unique structure that makes its ownership harder to trace, but many of the world’s oldest and wealthiest families can be traced back to Vanguard funds. ↑
151. One of the primary objectives of the globalists was to bring down the Ancien Régime. The ‘French Revolution’ claimed more lives in a single month in the name of atheism than the Inquisition did in the name of God throughout the Middle Ages and across the whole of Europe. This fact has been demonstrated by a reputable (and Protestant) historian, Pierre Chaunu. His analysis can be found in the fourth special issue of The New Man devoted to a number of myths surrounding anti-Christian history, including the Inquisition. A selection of extracts from this analysis is here.It was Voltaire and dear Jean-Jacques who first introduced the concept of unlimited enrichment, whereas the king, bound by religion, would never have dared to dream of such a scenario, which paved the way for the rise of the bourgeoisie and, subsequently, the industrialists. A must-read Secularism: the surrogate mother of Islam, by Odon Lafontaine, the standard reference work on these subjects. ↑
152. I suggest that the reader tackle the tedious but enlightening read that is Klaus Schwab’s famous rag, entitled The Great Reset. To save time, this article may be of interest to you. Many globalists are of Gnostic persuasion; as such, they love to sow confusion, particularly by attempting to reverse cause and effect. Here we see Schwab admitting on p. 222 that the pandemic is the least deadly that humanity has ever experienced, yet this does not prevent him from using this opportunity to try to shape the world according to his own views. ↑
153. Here is the Schwab family tree, just to give us a rough idea of how all the key players in the current crisis are intertwined. ↑
154. See Glaser, A. (8 July 2020). Thousands of contracts highlight quiet ties between Big Tech and the US military. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/thousands-contracts-highlight-quiet-ties-between-big-tech-u-s-n1233171See Usdin, S. (19 March 2020). DARPA’s gambles might have created the best hopes for stopping COVID-19. BioCentury. https://www.biocentury.com/article/304691/darpa-jump-started-technologies-behind-some-of-the-leading-covid-19-vaccine-and-antibody-hopes. ↑
155. These criminal organisations have already been ordered on numerous occasions to pay huge sums, which are merely a drop in the ocean compared to their budgets: 3.75 billion for GlaxoSmithKline; 3.3 billion for Pfizer, and so on. See the official list from the FDA, Violation Tracker Agency Summary Page, totalling 19.5 billion in fines. ↑
156. Wood, P. M. (2018). Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order. Mesa, AZ: Coherent Publishing, LLC. Fitts, C. A. (2019). Will ESG Turn the Red Button Green? The Solari Postponement.Fitts, C. A. (2020a). The State of Our Currencies: The End of Currencies. The Solari Postponement.Fitts, C. A. (27 May 2020b). The injection fraud – It’s not a vaccine. The Solari Postponement.Schinder, R. J. (26 January 2020). The Davos crowd embraces big global government. The Wall Street Diary.Schumacher, K. (14 March 2020). Technocracy and sustainable development. Redoubt News.White, J. (27 April 2020). Technocracy after COVID-19. Boston Review. ↑
157. See the revelations by Martin Füllmich and Dr David Martin in this historical video. David E. Martin is the founder and chairman of M-CAM Inc, the global leader in financing innovation, trade and intangible assets. He is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index based on innovation and is a managing partner at Purple Bridge Funds. He is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index – the CNBC IQ100, powered by M-CAM. Actively engaged in global ethical economic development, Dr Martin’s work encompasses financial engineering and investment, public speaking, writing and the provision of financial advisory services to the majority of countries worldwide. Dr Martin is the architect and founder of the Global Innovation Commons and the author of the international legal framework for the Heritable Knowledge Trust and Heritable Innovation Trust programmes. He has spearheaded global programmes aimed at bringing corporate and stock market transparency to multinational extractive industries and has played a pivotal role in repatriating value to countries that have been victims of corporate and financial abuse. ↑
158. See in «Influenza and Pneumonia», the chapter devoted to the destruction of homeopathy under Rockefeller’s auspices — with more than 225 billion dollars (in today’s terms) being injected into the scheme. The AMA’s second objective was «the eradication of homeopathy from American soil». See finally the work Thierry Lestrade’s documentary «How WADA Eradicated». ↑
159. According to Mr Kory, the WHO is merely playing along with the tactics set out in a time-worn ‘disinformation handbook’. This term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago, with the aim of describing the strategies that companies have developed over the decades to ‘attack science when it runs counter to their financial interests’. It consists of five parts:The Deception – Conducting fraudulent research and attempting to pass it off as legitimate research.
     The Blitz – Harassing scientists who speak out about findings that upset the industry.
     The diversion – Creating uncertainty about science where there is little or none.
     The screen – Build credibility through partnerships with the academic world or professional bodies.
     The solution – Manipulating civil servants or government processes to influence policy in an inappropriate manner. In the full Zoom call, which has since been censored by YouTube but is available on Bitchute, Pierre Kory describes how the five phases were deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin. A concrete example would be the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow studies on ivermectin to undergo peer review. ↑
160. Fauci’s emails from a certain period have been made public, revealing a veritable scandal, namely that he admits in them that:The coronavirus was man-made; the HQ is successfully treating the disease; asymptomatic individuals do not transmit the disease; masks are pointless; lockdowns are unnecessary; and Facebook played a part in promoting authoritarian Covid propaganda.The death toll was heavily manipulated; and that he deliberately lied to Congress under oath

     This information also casts a shadow over Professor Delfraissy (yet another collaborator, like so many others), who has spoken of his struggle to resist the pressure to authorise hydroxychloroquine. «I am under enormous political pressure to make hydroxychloroquine available to everyone, but I am resisting,» he wrote to the esteemed Dr Fauci. A week later, the Scientific Council issued a critical opinion on the Raoult protocol, having evidently resisted this «pressure». See article in the Parisian.

     What happened with something that massive? Nothing.

     Download the emails. See No.New York Post, see Fauci is a liar, ↑

161. I find it hard to say the name «Fauci’ without feeling sick. In ‘ The mistakes made by the American ‘Mr Covid’ are having an impact on the Western world, including Switzerland »Never before had ideas such as confining a healthy population, the widespread imposition of mask-wearing against a virus, or the «vaccination» of sections of the population who face greater risks from the vaccine than from the disease, had ever been considered, so contrary are they to ethics and scientific knowledge. A constant stream of doctors appearing on television programmes, riddled with conflicts of interest, has served to obscure this obvious truth, whilst advocates of sound medical practice have been denied a voice. Don’t miss this opinion piece written by the world’s two leading experts, Professors Kulldorff and Bhattacharya. ↑
162. See the first one document a masterclass by the German analysts (their interview (here) who, with the help of artificial intelligence, have scanned several million documents. This has made it possible to uncover the modus operandi of those behind the so-called ‘anti-Covid’ operation, and to demonstrate that it is a very tightly-knit network tasked with a specific mission: to compel the global population, by any means necessary, to submit to the dictates of private interests under the pretext of ‘public health’. The analysis is structured as follows: - The 20 to 30 key figures who quietly pursue their agenda in the shadow of high-profile figures such as Gates or Schwab;- The international financial flows and their (colossal) scale;- The NGOs (whose role, particularly in funding, is fundamental), universities and key companies through which the funds pass. These flows have been quantified by Schneeten and Röper. Analysts’ attention was drawn – to give just one example – to a small, unremarkable suburban house in the United States, used as a ‘postbox’ by several NGOs with tens of millions of dollars at their disposal.- The modus operandi for taking control of Western governments and institutions.Here, for example, are the ramifications of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, whose real manager is probably the Zionist and Democrat Warren Buffett, and which serves several purposes: 1 – it is a tax optimisation tool that allows its managers to evade tax and increase their wealth tenfold;

     2- The mechanism behind his «donations» is based on investment in the financial markets and large corporations (Total, Exxon, Shell, Monsanto, McDonald’s, The Coca-Cola Company); ;

     3- ‘donations’ are channelled to a range of organisations, all of which support globalism and the big pharmaceutical industry…

     He was probably recruited in the 1970s at Harvard (Gates is the first Zuckerberg), Bill Gates is both a catalyst for growth and an agent of influence for the oligarchic New World Order, a scapegoat put forward to take the flak, a cog in a network stretching from Wall Street to Israel via Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. See the article in E&R; here.

     ↑

163. To talk about something other than the virus, I think it’s worth saying a few words about the looming financial crisis, with the Evergrande scandal threatening to shake up the Chinese property market and the rest of the world by contagion —a word that strikes me as very apt here. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seems hardly inclined to take action in the face of the looming financial crisis, with the property bubble set to burst. Far from seeking to avert the crisis, the Chinese authorities seem instead determined to let it unfold in order to justify taking the country’s economy back under their control. It is only a short step from there to suggesting that this strategy also aims to weaken the West by spreading the financial crisis to it. Once again, the Great Reset and its ‘Big Government’ theory are challenging conventional wisdom and could put savers around the world in a difficult position. And the excellent Verhaeghe to conclude: « It is gradually becoming clear that Xi Jinping – who is neither a soft touch nor a liberal in the mould of Deng Xiaoping – is preparing to allow a financial crisis to erupt, one that is likely to put an end to the “capitalist” excesses of the Chinese economy, but which could also spread to the rest of the world. This approach, already employed during the COVID-19 outbreak – when internal communications within China were suspended whilst residents of Wuhan were still able to travel freely to the rest of the world – bears a strong resemblance to an attempt to destabilise the global economy. One cannot help but think that the emerging property crisis is, for the CCP, merely a piece in the jigsaw of a geostrategic ‘Great Reset’ designed both to dismantle the liberalisation of the domestic economy and to undermine the prosperity of the West. We therefore maintain our prediction that the crisis will be exploited, which could lead to global turmoil. » ↑
164. It was by manipulating the definition of «pandemic» that the whole affair was planned well in advance by the globalist establishment, of which Gates is one of the leading figures. As early as 2013, it was possible to understand that this little game was designed to serve the interests of pharmaceutical companies, with a view to creating as many pandemics as necessary to enable the mass production of vaccines. In 2009, the WHO had in fact removed the requirement for a high death toll in order to trigger the highest level of pandemic alert, which effectively paves the way for the start of vaccine production. This change in criteria therefore enabled vaccine manufacturers to make scandalous profits from the sale of experimental vaccines against H1N1 flu, a virus which, however, caused very few deaths and was even milder than the traditional seasonal flu.Dr Lydia Archilède wrote as early as 2013: ‘The system will become less precise, and therefore MORE VAGUE, with the criteria being reduced from seven to four; this vagueness will obviously benefit vaccine and antiviral manufacturers far more than it will serve the actual safety of citizens. Under the pretext of being based on ‘risk’, it will in reality be based more on ‘the possibility of a hypothetical risk’, keeping the most gullible members of the public in a state of near-permanent ‘fear of the coming pandemic’! Ultimately, the transition phase will sooner or later merge with the ‘inter-pandemic’ phase, and we will therefore be kept in a sort of permanent state of alert, much to the delight of Big Pharma and its investments! ’And our colleague concludes that ‘the opaque modus operandi remains unchanged in the way the WHO operates. It retains its dictatorial influence, since states which are supposedly able to assess the risk themselves at national level ‘will have to take into account the estimates made by the WHO’. Furthermore, the final decision on pandemics remains in the hands of a single person, the Director-General of the WHO, who will continue to be advised by the same sort of small ‘committee of experts’ that was, after all, at the root of the entire H1N1 fiasco and all that unimaginable waste! ” ↑
165. Readers may be interested in watching a few episodes of «’ on the subject of this cesspit« The Fall of the Cabal » by Janet Ossebaard and Cyntha Koeter. Although we find the early episodes highly questionable — I don’t agree with the narrative at all — those set in the modern era are fairly well researched. I recommend starting with the Number 6. ↑
166. Bouygues, Xavier Niel, Dassault, Bernard Arnault, Bolloré, Pierre Bergé, Patrick Drahi, François Pinault, Matthieu Pigasse and Lagardère: these are the ten billionaires who own the French media. All the national daily newspapers (Le Monde, Libération and Le Figaro), all the news channels (LCI, I-Télé, BFM-TV), most of the leading weekly magazines (Le Nouvel Obs, L’Express, Le Point) and private TV channels (Canal+, TF1) are owned by major billionaires. Such concentration has made it easy for Gates to get everyone to act in unison. See here. ↑
167. See the excellent article on Rumble : «Coronavirus. Violation of the fundamental rights of the world’s peoples through inhumane measures: lockdowns, compulsory mask-wearing, and remote learning.» ↑
168. We’ve are already to refuse to evacuate the unvaccinated section of the population from a Caribbean island! ↑
169. My hard drive is filling up with horrifying images showing the cruelty with which the police pounce on people and subject them to abuse, on absurd pretexts such as not wearing a mask outdoors, for example. France, Germany and Australia are the countries where such abuses have become commonplace. Just look at the following article. ↑
170. The very essence of fascism: prioritising a so-called collective interest over the individual interest: when consent and individual interests are no longer inalienable priorities, we move closer to the eugenic theories that flourished from the late 19th century onwards and were taken to an industrial scale by Nazism. Otto Dietrich explained in 1934: « «Individualist thinking is based on the premise that man is an individual. This premise is false. Man appears in the world only as a member of a community. In all his actions, Man is a social being and can only be understood as such. »The only real entities in the world are races, peoples and nations, not individuals. National Socialism regards the Volk as the only organic reality.’And Capitant, one of De Gaulle’s ministers, commented on this madness: « Nazi doctrine turns all values on their head. Not only is the individual now deprived of existence and therefore of rights, as Capitant notes, but he also loses all autonomy insofar as this glorification of the community leads to supposedly voluntary obedience to a Leader. The reign of Nazism is one of heteronomy and voluntary servitude».Read the article by Dr Delépine ↑
171. See the article a remarkable piece by Philippe Ségur, Professor of Public Law at the University of Perpignan Via Domitia. ↑
172. In the space of a year, agricultural producer prices have literally skyrocketed, with a 13.6 per cent rise signalling a return to hyperinflation. This rise is particularly pronounced in the case of cereals, which have seen a year-on-year increase of over 35 per cent. In the long term, the industrialised world is therefore facing an agricultural crisis that could enrich speculators whilst leaving consumers in a highly precarious position. It is therefore time to start stocking up on cereal-based agricultural products, or even to grow them yourself.The sharp rise in farm-gate prices over the past year is clearly illustrated by the graph above. As regards cereals, with an index of 120 at the start of 2021 (index of 100 at the start of 2019), prices had risen by October to an index of close to 150. Over two years, prices have therefore risen by 50%. It should be noted that the 120 index was reached only once, in the autumn of 2018. In other words, producer prices for cereals are currently breaking historical records, far exceeding the scenarios seen in recent years. This is seen as a sign of a deep-seated crisis. Source: Le Post strategists. ↑
173. Not evacuation on an island in the Caribbean where a volcanic eruption is raging, if you haven’t been vaccinated. The left-winger Chomsky is already saying that dangerous unvaccinated people should be locked up. And that wretch Berset has no qualms about declaring that everything will be the fault of the unvaccinated: ↑
174. See the excellent article by Mathieu Slama: «The unvaccinated are being made the scapegoats for the health crisis.». ↑
175. Having been labelled an anti-vaxxer, anti-mask and anti-PCR in an official letter addressed to me from the assistant to the county medical officer, I witness the decline of our society on a daily basis. One of the most striking examples of this — in my view — is the adoption of names such as «Avenue du Mondial» in towns and cities across France. A fine blend of agnotology and the old principle bread and circuses. ↑
176. See, for example, here a few pertinent comments on the speech at Harvard. ↑
177. See Secularism: the driving force behind Islam, by Odon Lafontaine. Article here. ↑
178. In his day, Cato the Elder used to conclude all his brilliant speeches with Delenda est Carthago! Carthage must be destroyed. «Globalism must be destroyed» must become our motto, our sole aim, if we want our children to live in a free world. ↑