Introduction
The word ‘protocol’ has a certain magical ring to it, much like the suffixes ‘pro’ or ‘plus’ that marketing often encourages us to add to a product’s name.
In the public imagination, ‘PROTOCOL’ is seen as the guarantor of ‘science’ and ‘seriousness’. Yet the term actually refers to the blind application of instructions handed down from above. Someone else has done the thinking for you, and you blindly apply their ‘knowledge’. It is also the phenomenon of the list. A police officer comes to take you and your whole family away at 3 am; you ask why, and the answer is: you’re on the list.
Conventional medicine is therefore keen on protocols because it seeks to stifle any capacity for independent thought on the part of those practising it; it is, ultimately, a powerfully fascist mechanism, though few people realise it. Doctors are told that their personal observations are worthless; only the industry’s statistics matter.
Yet what experience has taught us since time immemorial is that ALL the treatments proposed as protocols or methods by allopathic medicine have been abandoned… in favour of NEW protocols, and so on, without ever questioning the very mindset itself, which is fundamentally biased. Yesterday, these gentlemen were all practising bloodletting; today, they’re all administering vaccines. Yesterday, they were all prescribing sulphonamides; today, it’s the latest-generation antibiotic, which is ever more toxic. Yesterday they were prescribing cortisone to everyone (it was even a matter of social status; only a ‘posh’ doctor had corticosteroids in their arsenal); today, immunosuppressants have taken over…
An unsuitable model
Why is this way of thinking flawed? Quite simply because the industry focuses solely on standards, which drives standardisation and, above all, the homogenisation of its output. In the long run, this inevitably leads to a decline in all standards – which is the logical outcome of a system based on profitability – to the point where, before long, the weak link will be humankind itself, and we will have to consider doing away with it.
The idea, then, is to reduce human beings to nothing more than the common features shared by all people – arms, legs, noses – which, of course, results in a hideous caricature. Who cares about the infinite nuances that distinguish each of us from our neighbour? But that is the point: to impose on everyone the diktat of a distorted view because it disregards individuals. Mass production, mass medicine.
The industry has not treated a single patient for a long time now, but seeks only to sell its products for colossal profits. To this end, they blindly run a barrage of tests and, if anything turns up, they pay to come up with an ad hoc pathological theory that will support the product’s sale and justify its existence. The ‘scientific’ packaging evolves with the times, and now only impresses the system’s useful idiots, hypnotised by the fallacious notion of ‘progress’. Frankly, how dare these people lecture us on science?
A different perspective
Let’s get back to the subject at hand. Homeopathy is based on the fundamental observation that we will never be able to formulate a correct theory about how living organisms function. Rather, living organisms inform us of their own dysfunction through the pathological picture they present to us. It takes a good dose of humility to get past this initial conceptual hurdle.
The reality is that every individual is ill in terms of a totality of inseparable symptoms and carries their own family and personal history. This statement alone is enough to dash any hopes pinned on industrial ‘protocols’. What is more, the same causal factor – be it illness, poisoning or a vaccine, or an emotional shock – will NEVER produce the same effects in every individual. In biology, the same causes generate a myriad of different effects, which is exactly the opposite of the inanimate world where, for example, two electrons will always interact in a reproducible manner…
It is therefore doubly impossible to predict any protocol in advance without examining the case, since:
- the same factors produce different effects
-and that each patient will respond to this stress in their own way, with symptoms that vary from one individual to another.
What is strange, as the great Lippe pointed out, is that most of the men to whom the light is offered prefer to return to the darkness. Instead of starting by assessing the case, examining it and analysing it in order to understand it, we prefer to try a series of treatments, thereby making the patient a little more incurable each time.
11 vaccines: every man for himself
In view of the looming health crisis caused by the 11 compulsory vaccines, many parents are trying to have their cake and eat it. If I were to be more harsh, I would say they are trying to ease their anxieties whilst not daring to break the law. As a direct reflection of the dire state of homeopathy and the lack of training amongst those prescribing it, we are seeing a proliferation of protocols purported to mitigate the effects of the vaccines…
The ‘chlorum protocol’ for autism (sigh) and so many other supposedly homeopathic protocols like the one we’re discussing. All this is a good way of raising false hopes among distraught parents whilst at the same time undermining homeopathy, since the vast majority will be unaffected… but deeply disappointed. The creators of these protocols are keen to project an air of seriousness by mimicking the dominant allopathic medical establishment in this way. It would be more effective to study homeopathy thoroughly and amaze people with the results that only ‘true’ homeopaths achieve.
Let us begin by noting the arbitrary and untimely repetition. On what basis should one repeat the treatment every week? Every month? Every second? Only a serious study of homeopathy can answer these questions.
Mixing these different medicines not only produces effects that are completely unknown but also dulls the patient’s sensitivity to a medicine that might one day be correctly prescribed for them. In short, this is a form of muddling that is all the more severe because the prescriber has not the faintest idea of the concept of potency and makes patients swallow whole tubes, which is (if further proof were needed) yet another demonstration of their notorious incompetence. Consider that the medicinal influence of a single globule in 200 ml is sufficient to cause severe aggravations…
One must therefore assume that the inventor of the protocol possesses clairvoyant powers to be able to know in advance that Thuja is indicated. The Repertory provides us with the following list:
VACCINATION, follow-up to: acon.8, ant‑t.2+7, apis.2+7, ars., bell.8, bufo.7, carc.78, crot‑h.8, echi., hep., kali‑chl., kali-m.2+7, maland., merc.8, mez.7, nat-p.88, ped.7, psor.7, sabin.2+7, sars.7, sep.8, sil., sol-t-ae.88, sulph., thuj., tub. 2+7, vac. 7, vario. 7
How did this brilliant biped choose Thuja and not just any other remedy from this list, which may well be incomplete? It’s a mystery. But that’s not all; we’re now prescribing a potentised BCG vaccine: this is a product that hasn’t been tested, and this time we’re making people swallow a medicine whose properties we know nothing about. It’s therefore impossible to know what on earth the theory behind this is. Next to enter the fray is Silica, which is the antidote to Thuja! One wonders whether the inventor of this protocol ever got any further than studying homeopathy in a fashion magazine.
Isotherapy: fighting fire with fire
Then we come to the inevitable ‘isotherapeutic’ notion – that is, the magical belief that a vaccine in homeopathic form is capable of treating the very conditions it causes.
Isotherapy is utter nonsense; thousands of parents are being prescribed this grotesque distortion of homeopathy as a so-called ‘treatment’ for alleged vaccine side-effects. I shall have to reiterate here a few basic concepts that those who bring shame upon us by posing as homeopaths should have studied before prescribing.
– Illness is nothing more than an imbalance in vital energy; you can administer whatever chemicals you like, but these exist only on a nutritional level and are eliminated by the body. You can cleanse your colon or ‘detox’ (yet another absurd notion) as much as you like, but the dynamic imprint remains;
-Miasms are dynamic contaminants capable of affecting the vital force; some are acute, and may even be epidemic, whilst others are chronic, remaining embedded in the vital force, from which there is no cure, and which are passed on to future generations. A pioneer in epidemiology as well, Hahnemann identified four such miasms. Only anti-miasmatic homeopathic treatment can eradicate such conditions.
-Once potentised, a medicine is nothing more than an artificial disease capable, in turn, of contaminating the vital force, of exerting an effect upon it as a force – in the physical sense of the term – with a direction and an intensity. This contagion of the vital force then causes it to produce symptoms, that is to say, a new totality. This is what we call pathogenesis, when the substance is administered to a healthy subject: it is the only rational way to study the effects of medicines, by exploring their capacity to cause illness. Unlike natural disease, artificial drug-induced disease can be adjusted at will in terms of potency, but its effect wears off rapidly unless it is renewed at inappropriate intervals, which is of course the case with treatment protocols.
-only by taking into account the full range of symptoms – which reflect the body’s reaction, as a single entity, in response to the attack by the pathogen, will enable health to be restored, rather than causing a deterioration in health, as is the case with all piecemeal treatments that target only a single symptom.
-On paper, therefore, we have two options: to prescribe a medicine that has the property of creating a similar whole, that is, a ‘mirror image’ of the whole, known as an enantiomer. The second option, enanthiopathy, remains an abstraction and yields no results other than a worsening of the patients’ condition. Only the first option remains valid; this is called homeopathy (it had to be given a name, but you now understand that it is a general principle from which no one can escape).
Pathological susceptibility
When it comes to falling ill, there is a latent susceptibility to disease in every person, depending on their state of health, heredity, chronic miasms – which may or may not manifest themselves – and so on. In short, you will have noticed that falling ill is a conditional process and that, furthermore, the same causes do not always produce the same effects – a fact which, as we have seen, radically distinguishes biology from the inanimate physical world. Depending on one’s susceptibility, one may or may not fall ill when exposed to a pathogen. This occurs ONLY on a dynamic level; the disturbance to the vital force is then transmitted to the autonomic nervous system, the immune system, the endocrine system, and so on. Initially dynamic, the disturbance becomes chemically measurable and then anatomically visible. Conventional medicine thus spends its time pointlessly treating the effects, confusing causes and consequences…
Vaccines are just one aggressive factor amongst countless others. Viruses, bacteria, physical or emotional causes, and so on, play an equally significant role in triggering a chronic illness. But strictly speaking, the onset of chronic illness occurs ONLY because an existing chronic miasm has been ‘awakened’ by the aggressive agent. One can get an idea of this by imagining that the chronic miasm, like ivy, is attached to the vital force, which must constantly maintain a defence to prevent it from spreading. If, in order to cope with an acute pathogen, the vital force is forced to mobilise all its defences, you can see that the chronic miasm takes advantage of this to progress. Thus, there are no complications arising from acute illnesses, but only a reawakening of the latent chronic condition by the acute illness. This is a concept a billion light-years ahead of conventional medicine…
So a child is already born in a poor state of health because their parents have been worn down by a lifetime of allopathic medicine, pollution of all kinds, and so on (which makes sense, as a generation ago we didn’t see all these cases of autism). On top of this, the immune system assault represented by the vaccine – administered on a massive scale – opens up a breach that was just waiting to manifest itself. The child’s vital force remains chronically disrupted, resulting in a whole range of symptoms.
A range of symptoms
The naivety here lies in failing to understand a key point: the vaccine will trigger a TOTAL REACTION, which represents the vital force’s adaptation to the attack. In short, the vaccine is not simply a splinter to be removed with tweezers; it generates a GENERAL reaction, which will be UNIQUE TO EACH PATIENT. A new wholeness emerges. Once this is understood, the folly of believing that one can treat a disease USING its dynamised causative agent becomes apparent: it makes no sense whatsoever. No one cures measles with measles, staphylococcus with staphylococcus, pneumonia with pneumococcus, or a chill with a dilution of the north wind.
Imagine you’ve caught a chill – it’s exactly the same thing. The causative agent has triggered its effect, and depending on the individual case, you’ll end up with either… nothing at all, a cold, pneumonia, diarrhoea, and so on. To treat it, you have to find THE medicine that matches that reaction.
If you prescribe the isotherapeutic form of the vaccine, first of all, it is NOT the same as the raw vaccine. It has been transformed through potentisation. The vital force, upon contact with it, will receive an additional signal that is very similar to the original disruptive agent. Given that the body has already fallen ill as a result of the vaccine, it is reasonable to assume that it is susceptible to both the vaccine and its isotherapeutic preparation, which acts as something of a dynamic vector for it.
In practice, for this reason, there will inevitably be a reaction to the isotherapeutic treatment; that is why these wretched isotherapeutic treatments often cause severe flare-ups … which lead one to think, ‘It’s marvellous – something’s happening’. But where will this worsening lead? You’ll be forcing the body to react even more strongly in the same way it has already reacted to the vaccine. That’s all. Some symptoms will change, and very often new ones will appear. Full stop.
In conclusion, we are witnessing a scandalous abuse of patients by people with little or no training in homeopathy who nevertheless pass themselves off as homeopaths. It would undoubtedly be preferable for parents who are rightly anxious about administering these products – whose composition and effects are unknown – to take responsibility and speak out against an unjust law.
Dr Edouard Broussalian
–Article published in August 2018 on the Planète Homéopathie website
