Please do keep this document safe, as it will serve as evidence for future generations. I wrote it in January 21 after being utterly appalled by the fanaticism of those attending the ‘information’ meeting organised by Dr Siegriest, the high priestess of vaccinology, who has long since ceased to declare her conflicts of interest. Medical totalitarianism has led, on the one hand, to the dumbing down of the entire medical profession, and, on the other, to its most complete corruption. EB, 21 January 2026.
Dear Madam,
Your «information» session on 15 January about the Covid-19 vaccine gave me the feeling that I was witnessing a «scientific miracle»: here is a product that has been developed in a tenth of the time it would normally take —warp speed to use the intergalactic allegory so dear to Americans—a completely new treatment, with an efficacy —no less!— of 95%, on which we have no historical perspective, and whose principle involves «tinkering with » our own cells, which presents no risk of altering the genome but, at most, a few rare side effects that can be treated with a mild antihistamine, or even NSAIDs, and which can be prescribed to pregnant women. All this without us doctors incurring the slightest legal risk by administering an experimental gene-based vaccine which requires the human body to produce a viral protein!
| Le Temps – January 2021. Just one example among many of the disparagement of any opposition to the idea that the vaccine will save the world. |
I’m sorry, but no sensible doctor could possibly buy into such an argument. As for me, I remain astonished and even dismayed to see you prescribing — and encouraging others to prescribe — in the name of the age-old «benefits versus risks» balance ’—a potentially lethal product with unknown effects to millions of people who are unaware that they are taking part in what is nothing less than a global experiment, given that the Phase III trials for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines will not be completed until 2022.
In a famous poem, Ella Wheeler[1] writes that «it is by remaining silent when they ought to be shouting out that men become cowards». Although this is precisely the sentiment that drives me as a man, a citizen and a homeopathic doctor, allow me to offer you these few lines without departing from collegial courtesy.
The general climate of hysteria surrounding the dictatorship
Every citizen should question the validity of these increasingly absurd measures[2] and totalitarian measures under the pretext of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic:
- Widespread use of face masks which poses serious risks to healthy people[3]. In this regard, docility and submission[4] The medical profession’s response to this absurdity will go down in history as a shameful episode. A Chinese study published in *Nature*, involving an astronomical number of 10 million patients, has clearly shown that Asymptomatic people are not infectious. Why do our leaders persist with these stupid, harmful measures,[5] and absurd, when they themselves invoke «science» to justify their actions?[6]
- Indiscriminate lockdown —or rather house arrest— justified by dubious modelling, notably that of the highly influential Professor Ferguson. No doubt in need of funds despite generous funding from the Gates Foundation, the latter used a programme worthy of Sim City, enabling him to predict 500,000 deaths in Britain, then ultimately 20,000.[7] The greatest panic in history and the unprecedented paralysis of the economy are based on wild speculation.
- Widespread panic among the population, generated and fuelled by the media’s relentless drumbeat[8] and the PCR test. In this regard, one cannot help but compare the current situation with what we experienced during the false hepatitis B epidemic: «Every six hours in France, a patient dies from the effects of the hepatitis B virus,» the advertising messages of the time repeated over and over; or, as we read on the leaflets distributed in secondary schools: «Hepatitis B kills more people in a single day than AIDS does in a year». Dr Plassart, now consigned to oblivion[9] stated: «The hepatitis B virus is transmitted through sexual contact and saliva. When young people start kissing, they are at high risk of contracting hepatitis B. » How many panicked parents rushed to have their children vaccinated? How many teenagers told themselves they’d be done for with a kiss on the mouth, not to mention those who couldn’t remember drinking from a friend’s glass? Certainly, in the light of what we see today, the «hepatitis B epidemic» was nothing more than a mere rehearsal.
To our great misfortune, conventional medicine has subscribed to Pasteur’s paranoid notion that germs alone are enough to make people ill and that they must be combated. Even today, no one raises the fundamental question of the individual susceptibility, which is implicitly assumed to be 100%. - The PCR testing scandal[10] used incorrectly as a diagnostic tool — often completely out of touch with clinical practice.[11] The number of false positives increases almost exponentially from around thirty amplification cycles onwards. Which laboratory states how many CT cycles were performed and on which sequence? ? I agree with the view expressed by the international lawyer Reiner Fuellmich which states that «it’s the only way to keep people in a state of panic». It will no doubt no longer be possible to travel without proof of vaccination – something I had, unfortunately, predicted as early as March 2020. From today, for example, it will no longer be possible to travel to France without a PCR test a negative test result less than 72 hours old – yet another measure with absolutely no scientific justification.
- Systematic destruction of the economy by crazy and disproportionate measures completely unjustified in view of the a ridiculously low mortality rate of 0.05% with a case fatality rate of 0.5% for SARS-CoV-2 ?[12] You yourself told us that vaccination was justified to relieve pressure on hospitals. On this subject, a number of phone calls to various intensive care units in France and Switzerland have convinced me that we are being fed a load of rubbish regarding the occupancy of intensive care beds. Even assuming that hospitals are at full capacity, is vaccination really the right response to what is simply a deplorable mismanagement of healthcare provision on the part of our leaders?
- A genuine case of patient neglect and a barrier to accessing treatment in the community.[13]
- The measures implemented as a form of «prevention» for the elderly undoubtedly caused them to die of grief, isolated in their rooms.
- The GPs have been banned from prescribing hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, which work remarkably well[14], with the result that many cases were able to progress to severe forms and overwhelm hospitals. Criminal governments such as that of France have banned the prescription of a treatment that would have saved many lives – a ban based on a thoroughly bogus article published in a «prestigious» journal, which clearly illustrates just how far conventional medicine has fallen. Protocols involving Ivermectin have also amply demonstrated their effectiveness.
Innocent people were deliberately killed[15], whilst constantly insisting that there was no treatment and that our only hope lay in the vaccine, which we began to await as if it were the Messiah. - I would like to mention in passing the success achieved wherever it has been applied, despite repression, of homeopathic treatment at all stages of the disease. My direct and indirect personal experience amounts to around a hundred cases, all treated within a few days, without the slightest complication. In this regard, I would point out that homeopathy has developed and become widespread over the past two centuries precisely because of its stunning successes in treating all manner of epidemic diseases such as measles, yellow fever, scarlet fever, pneumonia, influenza, cholera, and so on. It is surely no coincidence that we witnessed a globally orchestrated attack on homeopathy shortly before the first cases of COVID-19 emerged. Following the delusional attack by the 124 complete strangers reported across all media outlets, without us ever being granted the slightest right of reply; it was the famous Australian NHMRC study that made headlines around the world and served as a pretext for governments in France and elsewhere to justify measures against homeopathy, even though a Senate inquiry An Australian woman revealed the forgery of the study. However, no denial has ever been published in the press, which brings us to the following two final points:
- Silencing of any dissenting voice by being immediately – and often hysterically – labelled as «conspiracy theories».[16] How did it come to this – that Professor Raoult is being prosecuted for quackery ? Why are Professor Perronne’s comments never reported in the mainstream media? Why are we not heeding the calls for caution from geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude, who has specialised in RNA for 12 years and is associate editor of a special issue of Current Gene Therapy, holder of two patents relating to RNA and a lecturer on international courses – when she warns of the risks of genetic alteration associated with vaccination?
- A a woeful system for reporting vaccine-related complications. A new study A peer-reviewed study on the adverse effects of MMR vaccines highlights the urgent need for independent research into vaccine safety and the importance of informed consent and vaccine choice. How is the much-discussed risk-reward balance assessed when data is manipulated? ?
Why should we trust what Pfizer or Moderna say?
To summarise the above, We set fire to the house because there was a mosquito in the bedroom. The advantage of a dictatorship is that it produces binary information: anything proclaimed to be true is highly likely to be false, whilst anything that is idolised should, on the contrary, be rejected. In such a context, the key figures who appear repeatedly in the media are, for the most part, suspect, as they are largely bound by sordid conflicts of interest. The case of Dr Fauci immediately springs to mind, with his manner of to be in awe on the «incredibly impressive» results of the Moderna vaccine, her criminal offence on HCQ, and his massive conflicts of interest, whether with his various patents, or its partnership with the Gates Foundation, which has committed to spend $100 million with the NIH.
In fact, ever since the start of the pandemic[17], if we are to believe, for example, the self-proclaimed expert As an expert in infectious diseases, Mr Bill Gates has been hammering home the message since February 2020 that there will be no return to normal without the vaccine (he was the first to say this). The Gates case also represents another miracle: the philanthropy has enabled him to triple his personal fortune, now estimated at around 96 billion dollars, and to understand everything about medicine without ever having studied it.
«Proving that there is no treatment for the virus has been a constant struggle, at the risk of laying bare the gross incompetence of various parties. » Writes Dr Michel de Lorgeril, who adds, «and any scientist who dares to say otherwise will be vilified and labelled a conspiracy theorist.»
Yet one need only look at the recent history of communicable diseases – involving new infectious agents (HIV/AIDS, Ebola, chikungunya, dengue, borreliosis, etc.) – to cast several doubts on the rosy narrative that would have us believe that vaccine technology will provide miraculous solutions to the COVID-19 crisis.
History reminds us that:
1- All epidemics eventually die out of their own accord
2- No vaccine has ever succeeded in bringing an epidemic to an end.[18]
As well as the «vaccine miracle» and the other miracles mentioned above, we are now expected to believe in yet another miracle: that Pfizer has suddenly become honest. Yet we have come to expect systematic, proven fraud from them: in 2009, Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion for the promotion of medicines for unauthorised uses of 13 medicines. And now, with global financial stakes at play, is our firm really going to provide us with reliable data? That figure alone – enough to make Stalin green with envy – should set alarm bells ringing.
Trust can only be built through the utmost transparency. Yet I do not see any of the speakers mentioning their conflicts of interest when discussing the vaccine.
In December 2007, a press release A press release from the University of Geneva announced that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was donating 1.3 million to UNIGE for ‘vaccinology’, with the aim of training decision-makers in this field. This sum was intended to fund an annual “vaccinology” training programme for public health officials from developing countries over a four-year period. In reality, however, nearly 5 million was received.
Don’t you see this as a clear conflict of interest in your case, which it would no doubt have been worth mentioning to us?[19]
Even the esteemed BMJ The fact that it is now deemed necessary to denounce «state corruption» and the «suppression of science» shows just how dire our situation is.
In this context, the immunity of laboratories[20] is not intended to persuade us. Nor is your misguided argument regarding medical liability.
You did indeed explain to me that the doctor administering the vaccine is not liable as long as they do not inject into a blood vessel. This does not seem correct to me in light of the article published in the BMS on 6 January 2021, in which the FMH’s lawyer explains that The doctor bears full and complete responsibility precisely because the patient was not given informed consent or comprehensive information.
However, as we have seen above, le vacciné participe sans son consentement à une gigantesque expérimentation médicale. We are therefore in complete breach of the law. Isn’t it fascinating that, in perfect unison, the entire political class and all the media outlets are trampling underfoot the Oviedo Convention – which Switzerland ratified in 2008 and France in 2012 – all in order to extol the virtues of a product that has not even yet been granted marketing authorisation? We’re operating completely outside the law, and you tell us, «Go ahead, it’s no problem!»
Nor are there any studies on people over the age of 75: we know nothing about how well these individuals tolerate the vaccine. Here again, to hear you tell it, it was the general population who were used as guinea pigs before the elderly were vaccinated. However, contrary to what you claim, there are clearly a great many fatal complications[21] among these vulnerable people, the very ones who were supposed to be protected by the vaccine. And, in keeping with the usual tautology, these deaths will be used to justify stepping up the vaccination programme. The relentless vaccination drive targeting the elderly, the fate that befell them in care homes, the liquidation—I can find no other word for it—of thousands of them with Rivotril and morphine: all this reeks of something foul. eugenics. Yet one would have to be rather uneducated not to realise that Ford, the Rockefellers and most American billionaires have always promoted eugenics, which in turn inspired Hitler.
Gates,[22] whose father, a banker with close ties to the Rockefellers, never made any secret of his eugenic views. None of this, either, is likely to put our minds at rest.
When I raised the issue of the risk of ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement), you told me how relieved you were to learn that, apparently, the vaccine does not produce any. Your response left me stunned:
– This implies that you vaccinated patients whilst being aware of a life-threatening risk, which you did not disclose to them.
– For someone who usually swears by research, you are dismissing this risk solely on the basis of your own personal experience, which is currently very limited.
The vaccine and its clinical trial, which is already highly controversial
The pharmaceutical company Pfizer probably began production of its mRNA Covid-19 vaccine well before obtaining the EC2020/1043 regarding the lifting of protection for its citizens against GMOs, and even before it had commenced its Phase III clinical trials, confident that it could secure marketing authorisation worldwide by enlisting the help of the former Commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Scott Gottlieb, whom it had recently recruited.
The vaccine technology used is in its infancy[23] in terms of scientific knowledge and involves numerous uncertainties regarding side effects beyond six months, none of which have been studied. Coronaviruses mutate naturally at a significant rate, and numerous variants of the original SARS-CoV-2 have already been circulating worldwide for months, making the idea of a single vaccine that is effective against all its current or future forms a pipe dream.
Financial liability for the serious post-vaccination effects of these vaccines has been transferred without difficulty to the purchasing states, which gives cause for concern regarding a total lack of caution and transparency on the part of all manufacturers, who will seek to place their products on the market as quickly as possible in this race for financial gain, given that these firms’ adherence to ethical standards has long been recognised as non-existent.
Many voices from civil society are already calling for vaccination – whether compulsory or segregating – relegating those not vaccinated against Covid to the status of second-class citizens, without any awareness of the financial manipulation they are perpetuating, at the obvious expense of human health and social harmony.
The clinical trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine should draw the reader’s attention to a highly unusual detail: both Pfizer and Moderna refer to «observer-blind». Usually, the term «double-blind» is used, and a Google search will show you that this term is virtually absent from the literature. That is rather strange.
At this point I must mention your rather confusing response to my question: you assured me that this was a double-blind study — but in that case, why not state it as such? — whilst also telling me that the testers had been unblinded. Are we therefore expected to believe it was a double-blind trial when it had in fact been «unblinded»? According to Dr Michel de Lorgeril, whom I regard as one of our leading experts in statistics and clinical trials, the The answer is clear : this is not a double-blind study and, as a result, the placebo effects are significant; both studies – those by Pfizer and Moderna – are deeply biased.
Peter Doshi, in a an outstanding article and unmissable, highlights what looks very much like a clever cover-up in Pfizer’s study, thanks to the additional data provided by the company to the FDA. Tinkering with groups, arbitrary exclusions – it all smacks of fraud. He writes, for example:
“All attention has been focused on the spectacular efficacy results: Pfizer reported 170 PCR-confirmed cases of Covid-19, ranging from 8 to 162 between the vaccine and placebo groups. But these figures were overshadowed by a category of illness known as ‘suspected COVID-19’ – those with symptomatic COVID-19 that had not been confirmed by PCR. According to the FDA’s report on the Pfizer vaccine, there were ‘a total of 3,410 cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 in the vaccine group compared with 1,816 in the placebo group.’"
«With 20 times as many suspected cases as confirmed cases, this category of illness cannot be ignored simply because there were no positive PCR test results.»
«Even after excluding cases that occurred within 7 days of vaccination (409 in the Pfizer vaccine group versus 287 in the placebo group) – which should include the majority of symptoms caused by short-term vaccine reactogenicity – the vaccine’s efficacy remains low: 29%»
What can be said about the data-sharing statement from Moderna, which states that these «may be available on request once the trial has finished». This is likely to be between mid- and late 2022, as a two-year follow-up is planned! Things may not be any different for the the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, which has promised patient-level data «when the trial is over». And the’ClinicalTrials.gov entry regarding the Russian Sputnik V vaccine states that there are no plans to share participants’ personal data.
Many other points could be raised, including the separate treatment of HIV-positive patients. Why is this? If it is down to immunosuppression, I would venture to say that there are many other such cases amongst the 40,000 people in the study. Furthermore, it is surprising that there were no deaths among all these people exposed to the virus over the course of the study…
Side effects
The strategy remains hopelessly the same; it is the same one used by all manipulators. The rush allows them to stir up as much emotional turmoil as possible to cloud the victim’s judgement. It doesn’t matter that in a few months« time the disaster can no longer be concealed: the billions will have found their way into the right pockets, and »after me, the deluge’.»
- Facilitating antibodies. The phenomenon of facilitating antibodies is an «inappropriate» response to a new viral infection, in which the antibodies present against that virus actually make the infection worse. These antibodies were produced following a previous infection (or vaccination) with a related virus (or, more rarely, with the same virus).[24]
According to Rachel Roper (expert in coronavirus vaccines, « SARS Vaccines: where are we? » Roper and Rehm, (, 2009) states that the main issue to be taken into account in the development of coronavirus vaccines is ADE: the facilitation of viral entry into cells via the immunoglobulin Fc fragment receptor. A 2016 review[25] A report, also written by vaccine developers, highlights the same concerns. A recent interview with two French vaccine experts also highlights this danger[26], American experts have also raised the issue.[27]
This ADE was demonstrated in animal trials of SARS-CoV-1 vaccines in 2003.[28] I must also mention here the disastrous results of Dengvaxia, yet touted in exactly the same way as our two new «miracle vaccines». In a magnanimous gesture, Sanofi has offered to reimburse the government for the unused doses. Who is concerned with monitoring the health of the 850,000 schoolchildren who have been vaccinated? The approach is as misguided as compensating plantation owners when they were forced to free their slaves. One might also read with interest in a another key article Disclosure in the informed consent form to participants in vaccine trials regarding the risk that COVID-19 vaccines may worsen clinical disease : The risk of a specific and significant ADE associated with COVID-19 should have been, and should be, disclosed in a prominent and independent manner to participants currently taking part in vaccine trials, as well as to those being recruited for the trials and to future patients following the vaccine’s approval, in order to meet the medical ethical standard of ensuring patients’ understanding so that they can give informed consent. - The PEG, which is supposed to be an inert component. The issue of tolerance to PEG has been overlooked: this product is already so widespread that 72% of the US population contains antibodies ! You have «reassured» us by stating that there is no need to worry about this, certainly, but to my knowledge there have been no serious studies on the subject. Do we also have any pharmacokinetic data on the substance? Could some cases of anaphylactic shock following injection be caused by this? Nobody knows.
- Genetic risk. As we mentioned earlier, we are flouting both the Oviedo Convention and the Nuremberg Codes. No patient is informed that they are taking part in a clinical trial, nor of the risk of infection facilitation (ADE), let alone the genetic risk associated with mRNA technology.
This risk is serious enough not to be dismissed out of hand, as you are doing. This raises the issue of medicine being based on fragmentary scientific discoveries. The incompleteness theorem of Gödel Yet one thing is clear: your knowledge of a particular field is finite, whilst that field itself is infinite.
This definitively puts an end to the old allopathic approach based on reductionism: you will not be able to never to know or understand how a set of 10 behaves13 cells, nor the interactions between these cells, let alone what goes on in the intracellular mechanisms, which are probably of the same order of magnitude.
The wickedness that is becoming apparent in this vaccination campaign is inherent in the allopathic mindset, which has always imposed the same treatment on all patients. By denying individual differences, allopathic medicine makes itself the natural accomplice of all dictatorships.
There is absolutely no way of knowing for certain that there will be no impact on DNA. To begin with, we do not know the composition of the vaccine. Does it contain residual DNA, for example? We do not know. Another point to clarify is the presence of reverse transcriptase. A simple retrovirus infection makes its presence possible. In these circumstances, who, for example, is concerned about the spumavirus infections which affect 100% of the animal kingdom, the prevalence of which in the population is unknown? - Selection of the most virulent strains. When a virus infects a human population, only those viruses that have a living human host survive. If a virus is so pathogenic that it kills the person it has infected, it too dies. Consequently, host mortality eliminates the most severe forms of any virus over time. Infection rates may rise, but mortality falls.
The Researchers have put forward the hypothesis that that vaccination can reverse this process by allowing more virulent strains of the virus (i.e. those that are more pathogenic and potentially fatal) to survive in vaccinated hosts for prolonged periods without killing them.
Conclusion: science and profit
As the tragedy of the Titanic has shown since 1912: science and profit do not mix. Rabelais’s saying is too well-known to quote here; I shall simply say that science ceases to exist the moment it becomes a hostage to money. The example of the coronavirus vaccination will undoubtedly serve as a global revelation of a medical system that has long since gone astray — not to say from the very outset[29],— in a case of corruption the extent of which we cannot fathom.
From the meagre arguments set out above, however, we can nevertheless gauge another dimension: that of the global tragedy that is unfolding and which — I hope — will prompt people to wake up to the reality of the situation and rise up in protest. Then the time will come to answer for our actions before the courts, and for my part — having to answer only to God and my own conscience — I have no desire to find myself in the dock. I refuse to be an accomplice to sheer madness and an unprecedented crime, for no one has the excuse of saying (this time?) «I didn’t know».
That is why, Professor, I share neither your optimism, nor your naivety, nor your eagerness to urge doctors to administer injections whilst breaking the law.
In the hope of having the pleasure of meeting you in the near future, please accept, Madam, my warmest regards.
Dr Edouard BROUSSALIAN
Geneva, 20 January 2021
Response received from Professor Claire-Anne SIEGRIST
Dear Colleague,
Thank you for sharing your views with me; I respect them and fully understand that your specialisation in naturopathy/homeopathy gives you a different perspective to that of the infectious disease specialists and vaccinologists who make up the Infovac expert panel.
We are offering these Q&A sessions as an extension of the service we provide day in, day out to Infovac subscribers – aware that they meet the expectations of many… but not everyone. We answer live, off the cuff, to the best of our ability – though sometimes not as clearly as we’d like, or as we realise in hindsight. Sorry about that!
I’m also sorry that I don’t have time to respond to each of the views expressed… as the late hour of this message shows…
Fortunately, there are many sources of information, allowing everyone to find out what they need to know in the way that suits them best. As regards vaccine safety, you have no doubt heard today’s press release from Swissmedic confirming that the vaccine is very well tolerated, even among the very elderly, who accounted for the vast majority of the first 120,000 vaccinations…
Yours sincerely,
Claire-Anne Siegrist
SIDE EFFECTS: A BRIEF PRESS REVIEW
Information from the CDC: 3,150 people vaccinated in a single day are «unable to carry out normal daily activities and unable to work» following vaccination.
This represents a staggering 2.7% of people who are no longer able to work after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
California has suspended the use of a batch of the Moderna vaccine following allergic reactions. California’s chief epidemiologist, Dr Erica S Pan, issued a statement recommending a suspension of the administration of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine batch ‘041L20A’
Vaccination of the elderly: 23 deaths in Norway… As of 18 January, 33 deaths. Chinese experts are calling for the suspension of the Pfizer vaccine programme. 10 deaths in Germany.
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n149
and
and
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/china-health-experts-suspension-covid-vaccines-norway/
and
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202101/1212915.shtml
Coronavirus: Mexican doctor develops encephalomyelitis 30 minutes after receiving the vaccine
A 41-year-old Portuguese healthcare worker has died two days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, whilst his father says he «wants answers»
Mexican doctor hospitalised after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-mexico-vaccines-idUSKBN2970H3
Hundreds of Israelis have contracted Covid-19 after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
https://www.rt.com/news/511332-israel-vaccination-coronavirus-pfizer/
The wife of the “perfectly healthy” doctor from Miami, aged 56, who died from a blood disorder 16 days after receiving the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, is certain that it was triggered by the vaccine, whilst the pharmaceutical giant investigates the first death with a suspected link to the jab.
A 75-year-old Israeli man dies two hours after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/293865
Death of a Swiss man following a Pfizer vaccine.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-swiss-death-idUSKBN29413Y
An 88-year-old man collapsed and died several hours after being vaccinated.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/293952
Thousands of people have experienced adverse effects after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.
A hospital worker with no previous allergies, working in intensive care, who experienced a severe reaction following the Pfizer Covid vaccine.
Four volunteers have developed facial paralysis after receiving the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, prompting the FDA to recommend «case monitoring».
https://www.rt.com/usa/509081-pfizer-vaccine-fda-bells-palsy-covid/
An investigation has been launched after two people died in a Norwegian care home a few days after receiving the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
https://www.rt.com/news/511623-norway-covid19-vaccine-deaths/
Hundreds of people have been taken to A&E after receiving COVID-19 vaccines
US authorities have reported more severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN29B2GS
The NHS advises against administering the Covid vaccine to those with a history of allergic reactions.
COVID-19: A single dose of the vaccine carries a «greater risk» of new coronavirus variants, warn South African experts
The CDC has revealed that at least 21 Americans have suffered life-threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine
A woman is experiencing side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine
www.everythinglubbock.com/news/local-news/woman-experiences-side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccine/amp/
Side effects of the COVID vaccine are more common after the second dose.
www.boston.cbslocal.com/2021/01/05/covid-vaccine-side-effects-fever-reaction/amp/
Bulgaria Reports Four Cases of Side Effects from the Pfizer Covid Vaccine.
Two NHS staff members have suffered an allergic reaction to the Pfizer vaccine.
DEATHS AMONG THE ELDERLY FOLLOWING THE PFIZER VACCINE
Excerpts from the Official VAERS (USA), subject to the following reservations:
VAERS is jointly managed by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS accepts and analyses reports of adverse events (possible side effects) following vaccination. Anyone can report an adverse event to VAERS. Healthcare professionals are required to report certain adverse events, and vaccine manufacturers are required to report all adverse events that come to their attention.
VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to submit reports of their experiences to the CDC and the FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine whether a vaccine caused a health problem, but is particularly useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns in adverse event reporting that might indicate a potential safety issue with a vaccine.
REFERENCES
[1] «Poems of Problems», 1914, pp. 154–55.
[2] The packed smoking areas at airports, the ban to sing, etc…
[3] Dr Russell Blaylock that not only do face masks fail to protect healthy people from falling ill, but they also pose serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not ill, you should not wear a face mask.
[4] In this regard, I have no doubt that wearing a mask is also a clear sign of submission on the part of a brainwashed population, and for our leaders, a reliable indicator of the impact of their propaganda.
[5] See, in particular, Corona Children Studies «Co-Ki»: Initial findings from a Germany-wide registry on the use of face coverings (masks) among children, a German study involving 20,930 children, which highlights the disastrous consequences of wearing masks.
[6] All these measures are causing a state of collective bewilderment quite comparable to the social engineering undertaken during the heyday of Marxism-Leninism. You will no doubt be interested in listening to the remarkable lecture by Bruno Riondel, which I believe offers the best insight currently available into the situation.
[7] See, in particular, – Aurélie Haroche. ‘When politicians confuse mathematical modelling with astrology’. JIM (Journal International de Médecine). 25 April 2020.
– Jean-François Toussaint, Andy Marc. Emerging from a blind lockdown. La Recherche. 22 April 2020.
– Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghan. Modelling the models. CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). 3 April 2020.
[8] According to Dr. Pascal Sacré, an intensive care doctor, states that the effect of the media on the population mirrors, on a global scale, Pavlov’s experiments on dogs concerning transmarginal inhibition. The four components of transmarginal inhibition are currently being applied to the entire global population:
1- Increasingly intense fears, with no real solution or plan B.
2- Creating growing expectations and uncertainty.
3- Confusion and division, a constant barrage of information—including everything and its opposite—even, or perhaps especially, from so-called «experts».
4- Physical and mental decline.
[9] Ouest-France, 6 September 1998.
[10] See, in particular, the an excellent article by Dr Sacré, «Can the PCR Lie?», on the AIMSIB website.
[11] See this article «PCR tests: an essential shift from qualitative to quantitative testing», as well as this one even more explicit, which speaks quite openly of deception.
[12] See the interview with Dr Louis Fouché, Nexus, No. 132, p. 88.
[13] The general practitioner must be placed at the centre of the patient care process to become the cornerstone of healthcare provision. A genuine early-intervention approach must be put in place, whether for population-based prevention or the treatment of patients, as any modern medical system should do.
[14] A study recently published Italian book relating to A study of 3,451 hospitalised patients revealed 301 fewer deaths, which was better than that reported for the very expensive remdesivir used in hospitals, which Fauci has praised. A study the earlier, smaller Italian version a showed a reduction of 66% in deaths among hospitalised patients. A study Belgian relating to A study of 8,075 hospitalised patients revealed a reduction of 65%. Similarly, a study A recent report from Saudi Arabia revealed 43% fewer hospitalisations and 45% fewer ICU admissions. For high-risk patients in care homes in Spain, the HCQ halved the risk of a poor outcome.
A large study of the Henry Ford Hospital System a revealed a mortality rate among 2,541 patients of 13.5% for HCQ alone, 20.1% for HCQ plus azithromycin, and 26.4% for neither.
[15] And it is not my intention here to discuss how thousands of elderly people were killed off — there is no other way to put it — with morphine and Rivotril in order to free up beds in intensive care. This issue alone should be enough to send our politicians and certain colleagues straight into the dock.
[16] Please see the article I wrote on Planet Homeo on this notion of «conspiracy theories», which is one of the hallmarks of the drift towards totalitarianism we are currently witnessing.
[17] Here, too, I shall not go into the implications of the way in which the WHO — a body effectively controlled by our dear philanthropist Gates — has changed the definition of the term.
[18] Just to remind you: it was not vaccination that eradicated smallpox, but lockdown. See the report of the WHO.
[19] You will find an article on the internet, which mentions in particular that «The issue that will have to be addressed sooner or later is the pivotal position occupied by Ms Siegrist at the crossroads between local and supranational authorities, biotech firms and personal patents – in short, everything to do with the composition of vaccines. »
[20] In the “Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act”, we see the formalisation in the US of complete impunity for pharmaceutical companies.
[21] Vaccination of the elderly: 23 deaths in Norway… As of 18 January, 33 deaths. Chinese experts are calling for the suspension of the Pfizer vaccine programme. 10 deaths in Germany.
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n149
and
and
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/china-health-experts-suspension-covid-vaccines-norway/
And the list is far from exhaustive; it seems to be growing exponentially. Fifty deaths in care homes in Nice as I write this, with alarming calls on the situation.
[22] Speech by Bill Gates, «Innovating Towards Zero» at the annual TED2010 conference in Long Beach, California, on 18 February 2010. Around the 4-minute mark, Gates says: « Let’s look first at the population. The world’s population currently stands at 6.8 billion. It is set to reach around 9 billion. However, if we do an excellent job on new vaccines, healthcare and reproductive health services, we can reduce that figure by 10 or 15 per cent. »
[23] In fact, I imagine that what we are witnessing here is the first step towards an entirely new technology: there are no limits to «genetically modifying» human organisms to make them secrete any product whatsoever.
[24] An article published recently (January 2020 in the journal Vaccine funded by the vaccine industry), (Wolff GC, (2020) shows that…’Previous vaccination against seasonal flu may make people more susceptible to coronavirus infections : this refers to coronaviruses in general, as the study was published before the emergence of the new virus.
[25] Enjuanes et al., 2016.
[26] Launay O. and Floret D., 2020.
[27] Hotez, 2020; Peeples L., 2020; Akiko Iwasaki & Yexin Yang, 2020.
[28] Tseng et al., 2012; Bolles et al., 2011; Yasui et al., 2008.
[29] In the never-ending whirlwind of the race to publish, modern medicine has come to lose sight of its own roots. I recommend reading the Chapter II How the American Medical Association eradicated «folk medicine» taken from Thierry de Lestrade’s book, «Fasting: A New Therapy?»
